Lawsuit: In Session Bank of Reveille v. Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) [2025] FCR 22

Your Honor,

The plaintiff rests.
 
The defendant may now cross-examine the witness. 48 hours to present questions, and the witness has 48 hours starting from the time of presentation to answer them.
 
Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case.
 
Your Honor,

The plaintiff would like to request the reason for the change of presiding officer mid-case...
 
Nacho said:
Your Honor,

The plaintiff would like to request the reason for the change of presiding officer mid-case...
Click to expand...
The decision to change the presiding officer mid-case was made in the interest of upholding the right to a speedy trial. Given Kai's substantial caseload, the courts determined reassignment would be appropriate.
 
Your Honor, The Plaintiff requests a 14 hour extension to witness questioning due to some unexpected IRL obligations. (12:32am EST deadline).
 
Angryhamdog said:
Your Honor, The Plaintiff requests a 14 hour extension to witness questioning due to some unexpected IRL obligations. (12:32am EST deadline).
Click to expand...
Granted.
 
@Freeze_Line
  1. Does the DOJ have any legal requirement to comply with the requests of the FRB?
  2. Did the FRB take any part in executing the search warrant?
  3. In your opinion, was the execution of the warrant in line with standard legal procedures?
  4. Who was responsible for ensuring the warrant request was properly written?
  5. What would be the process for officially challenging a warrant?
  6. Did the Bank of Reveille provide the required balance sheets before the warrant was filed?
  7. Did the DOJ verify the claims made by Reserve Governor Stoppers before filing the warrant?
  8. Did the warrant seek anything other than the BORs balance sheets?
  1. "Why is that this policy is inaccessible to the public via the forums?" - Judicial Officer
    - Yes
  2. "How is the public supposed to find these policies?" - Judicial Officer
    - Yes
  3. "The policy says it’s open to the public, yet it is also classified?" - Judicial Officer
    - Yes
  4. "Why does this say Act, which converts the idea that this is an Act of Congress when this is a financial policy?" - Judicial Officer
    - Yes
Click to expand...
9. Did the Judicial Officer approve the warrant after stating the comments you confirmed above?

We will be asking follow-up questions depending on the Witnesses answers.
 
Last edited:
1. Does the DOJ have any legal requirement to comply with the requests of the FRB?
- We always investigate if we believe something is illegal. I'm not entirely sure if there is a law that specifically requires us to do so however.

2. Did the FRB take any part in executing the search warrant?
- The balance sheet was later provided directly to the FRB instead of me, but they did not take any part in executing the search warrant.

3. In your opinion, was the execution of the warrant in line with standard legal procedures?
- I believe so, yes.

4. Who was responsible for ensuring the warrant request was properly written?
- I was, based on the information provided to the DOJ.

5. What would be the process for officially challenging a warrant?
- I don't think you can actually challenge a warrant. If the judge approves it, it's approved.

6. Did the Bank of Reveille provide the required balance sheets before the warrant was filed?
- I asked for the balance sheet after the warrant was filed, but it was not provided to the FRB before the warrant was filed.

7. Did the DOJ verify the claims made by Reserve Governor Stoppers before filing the warrant?
- The FRB provided screenshots.

8. Did the warrant seek anything other than the BORs balance sheets?
- No.

9. Did the Judicial Officer approve the warrant after stating the comments you confirmed above?
- Yes.
 
My apologies for the wait. The Defendant will only be asking one followup question:

@Freeze_Line
Follow-up for question 8:
Was the Bank of Reveille already legally required to provide the Balance Sheets under the powers granted to the FRB under the Bank Reserve Requirement Act?
 
Angryhamdog said:
Follow-up for question 8:
Was the Bank of Reveille already legally required to provide the Balance Sheets under the powers granted to the FRB under the Bank Reserve Requirement Act?
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
Your Honor, the Defense has no more questions. Thank you.
 
Cross-examination has now ended. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to submit their closing statement. @Nacho
 
Your Honor,

We request a 24-hour extension as I have been working straight 12-13-hour days in retail in the springtime. After getting home, I have been dead for the past couple of days.
 
Nacho said:
Your Honor,

We request a 24-hour extension as I have been working straight 12-13-hour days in retail in the springtime. After getting home, I have been dead for the past couple of days.
Click to expand...
Granted.
 
Your Honor,

We request a 24-hour extension, I have been requested to take up the closing statements at this time, and while I appreciate that the court has provided a 24-hour extension just prior, I would ask for just a smidge more to properly formulate a closing statement as the plaintiff has come unto a busy schedule.

We appreciate the court during this time and thank you for your patience in this matter, we will have a closing statement prepared within this time. Thank you again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top