Appeal: Denied Case No. 10-2020-13 - Appeal Request

Status
Not open for further replies.

Milkcrack

Citizen
Construction & Transport Department
Education & Commerce Department
MilkCrack
MilkCrack
- Client Name: Partypig678
- Counsel Name: Milkcrack
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: I was co-counselling the original case.
- Reason for the Appeal:
Partypig678 did not get a chance to a fair trial. He did not have a chance to defend himself.
My client has overwhelming evidence that some of the facts listed in the complaint are simply incorrect.
Also, the plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
The plaintiff claim for relief is "compensation" and I think it sets terrible precedents to rule in his favour.
- Additional Information:
I would like the case to be reopened and someone else to preside over this case

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top