- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Messages
- 173
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Milqy
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: LHBank is run and operated by both Milqy & Secretary Deadwax. On July 13th, Milqy proposed a contract to Former DEC Secretary Wetc that would sell DEC minting requests to LHBank for $0.01 on the dollar. The dollar amount of those debts were $770,635, bought by LHBank for $7,706.35. This is an absurdly lower price than what would be considered justifiable. This proposal was made after the former secretary was asking around in a VC what final acts he could do to abuse his position as DEC Secretary because he didn't care about the punishment. During the VC they drafted the contract. After the contract was signed in the same VC Milqy and Wetc also mentioned that they were going to quickly delete any incriminating messages. LHBank later sold/attempted to sell, these DEC minting requests to multiple banks. These offers were around $0.50/dollar, however were at different amounts for each offer. Selling the minting request at this price would net LHBank with a profit of $377,611.15.
The cause for money laundering is the following:
Money laundering is defined as:
“Any act to conceal funds illegally obtained, through commercial transactions, business deals, or any means otherwise."
The Minting Request (and the profits made form the subsequent selling of those minting requests) are considered funds. These funds were illegally obtained through corruption. These funds were concealed through a business deal in which the bank owners who bought the minting request were forced to secrecy
The only reason Wetc accepted this contract from LHBank is that Milqy, Deadwax and Former DEC Secretary Wetc were "best friends". Along with a friendship, the three also shared a political partnership, with both Wetc, Deadwax and Wetc being among the highest ranking members of the MHP. Wetc being chairman and later on leaving the chairmanship to Milqy. Deadwax, and Milqy assisted Wetc in signing a contract that would benefit their own business ventures, which is cause for the charge of Accomplice to Corruption. After the fact, Milqy and Deadwax have intentionally tried to block any inquiries into the original contract, as well as the subsequent selling of those DEC-Minting requests to other banks. They went as far as creating a group chat called "If we go down we go down together". This is cause for the charge of Obstruction of Justice against the Defendant. Making people enter into a contract to not talk to the Department of Legal Affairs. Which is the definition of Obstruction of Justice.
PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth of Remont
2. Milqy
II. FACTS
1. Milqy & Deadwax created a group called "If we go down, then we go down together"
2. Milqy & Deadwax forced people to sign an NDA to not talk to the Department of Legal Affairs so we couldn't conduct an investigation.
3. Deadwax & Milqy have a very strong political and economic tie and would both profit tremendously from this operation as both are owners of LHBank.
III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 1 count of Accomplice to commit Corruption.
2. 1 count of Obstruction of Justice.
3. 1 count of Money Laundering.
IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. The Commonwealth asks the maximum fine for 1 count of Accomplice to commit Corruption for the Defendant which is a $3,750 fine and 1.5-month removal from public office.
2. The Commonwealth asks the maximum fine for 1 count of Obstruction of Justice for the Defendant which is a verbal warning.
3. The Commonwealth asks for the maximum fine for 1 count of Money Laundering for the Defendant which is a $50,000 fine and 10min of jail-time.
Evidence:
As the list of evidence is so large, I will attach the Report from the Office of the Attorney General.
docs.google.com
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 2nd day of August, 2022.
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Milqy
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: LHBank is run and operated by both Milqy & Secretary Deadwax. On July 13th, Milqy proposed a contract to Former DEC Secretary Wetc that would sell DEC minting requests to LHBank for $0.01 on the dollar. The dollar amount of those debts were $770,635, bought by LHBank for $7,706.35. This is an absurdly lower price than what would be considered justifiable. This proposal was made after the former secretary was asking around in a VC what final acts he could do to abuse his position as DEC Secretary because he didn't care about the punishment. During the VC they drafted the contract. After the contract was signed in the same VC Milqy and Wetc also mentioned that they were going to quickly delete any incriminating messages. LHBank later sold/attempted to sell, these DEC minting requests to multiple banks. These offers were around $0.50/dollar, however were at different amounts for each offer. Selling the minting request at this price would net LHBank with a profit of $377,611.15.
The cause for money laundering is the following:
Money laundering is defined as:
“Any act to conceal funds illegally obtained, through commercial transactions, business deals, or any means otherwise."
The Minting Request (and the profits made form the subsequent selling of those minting requests) are considered funds. These funds were illegally obtained through corruption. These funds were concealed through a business deal in which the bank owners who bought the minting request were forced to secrecy
The only reason Wetc accepted this contract from LHBank is that Milqy, Deadwax and Former DEC Secretary Wetc were "best friends". Along with a friendship, the three also shared a political partnership, with both Wetc, Deadwax and Wetc being among the highest ranking members of the MHP. Wetc being chairman and later on leaving the chairmanship to Milqy. Deadwax, and Milqy assisted Wetc in signing a contract that would benefit their own business ventures, which is cause for the charge of Accomplice to Corruption. After the fact, Milqy and Deadwax have intentionally tried to block any inquiries into the original contract, as well as the subsequent selling of those DEC-Minting requests to other banks. They went as far as creating a group chat called "If we go down we go down together". This is cause for the charge of Obstruction of Justice against the Defendant. Making people enter into a contract to not talk to the Department of Legal Affairs. Which is the definition of Obstruction of Justice.
PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth of Remont
2. Milqy
II. FACTS
1. Milqy & Deadwax created a group called "If we go down, then we go down together"
2. Milqy & Deadwax forced people to sign an NDA to not talk to the Department of Legal Affairs so we couldn't conduct an investigation.
3. Deadwax & Milqy have a very strong political and economic tie and would both profit tremendously from this operation as both are owners of LHBank.
III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 1 count of Accomplice to commit Corruption.
2. 1 count of Obstruction of Justice.
3. 1 count of Money Laundering.
IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. The Commonwealth asks the maximum fine for 1 count of Accomplice to commit Corruption for the Defendant which is a $3,750 fine and 1.5-month removal from public office.
2. The Commonwealth asks the maximum fine for 1 count of Obstruction of Justice for the Defendant which is a verbal warning.
3. The Commonwealth asks for the maximum fine for 1 count of Money Laundering for the Defendant which is a $50,000 fine and 10min of jail-time.
Evidence:
As the list of evidence is so large, I will attach the Report from the Office of the Attorney General.
Special Report on Minting-gate
Minting Request Contracts Investigation Report. Official Special Report (July 28th 2022). Office of the Attorney General Note: This is the current state of our investigations, we currently believe that the evidence and the story are correct however if new evidence is found we will adjust our fi...
docs.google.com
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 2nd day of August, 2022.
