- Joined
- Jul 21, 2023
- Messages
- 226
Respond to Follow-up Question:Follow-up Questions
1.1 Would you say being killed repeatedly and consistently being disturbed is annoying?
Yes, in my personal opinion it is annoying and quite frustrating.
Respond to Follow-up Question:Follow-up Questions
1.1 Would you say being killed repeatedly and consistently being disturbed is annoying?
Follow-up Questions1. to stop them from destroying my friends hard work
1. i plead the 5thFollow-up Questions
1.1 Did the victim request you to leave his property?
1.2 i plead the fifthFollow-up Questions
1.2 So you will not confirm or deny that the Victim requested you to leave his property?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Commonwealth of Redmont v. zLost [2023] FCR 108
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. Defendant harassed MrFluffy2U94 with relentless killing.
2. The Defendant did these acts solely because they failed to win a DCT auction that MrFluffy2U94 won.
II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Actions in question are not Harassment.
III. THE COURT OPINION
1. To put this simply, yes, this Defendant did in fact commit Harassment and given the missing of an Opening Statement and Closing Statement this shows they either agree with the fact or simply believe this case should be thrown out. Given they only defended with a Motion to Dismiss will believe the latter. Despite that there is still clear evidence showing that the Defendant did commit the acts in questions and did commit harassment.
2. While, MrFluffy2U94 could've had the building vaulted in turn for a faster teardown and to appease the Defendant. They are not required to do so and given the Defendant even after MrFluffy2U94 stated they are not going to and started attacking, messaging, and other. All of this would mean harassment and fits within the charges laid out and arguments of the Prosecution.
IV. DECISION
1. Given this, I will be ruling in favor of the Plaintiff however will not be granting a full Prayer I will be amending Prayer One to the amount below. Reasoning for this is the sheer amount of the compensation and jail time requested. Instead the amount listed is still showing the Defendant to not do the actions again and will also be a low amount as to not bankrupt the Defendant.
As for the rest of the Prayers, they are all granted as normal due to the low amount or simply because of the dependent on the rest of the Prayers.
With that said, the charges are as follows: