Dartanboy
Citizen
Supporter
3rd Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Legal Eagle
Dartanboy
Attorney
- Joined
- May 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,442
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Dartanman
(Plaintiff)
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
(Defendant)
COMPLAINT
First of all, this is a serious issue and I'm not comfortable hiring someone else to represent me in this case. I recognize that I am a Justice, but I am only representing myself - not someone else - so this should be permissible, as long as I recuse from similar cases that occur concurrently.
As for the complaint:
The DLA and RBI have conducted an unreasonable search and seizure against me - which the Constitution protects me from.
Furthermore, when I refused to allow the unreasonable search, I was charged with Obstruction of Justice - or at least, the RBI was instructed to charge me. I have not been in-game since this happened and it may or may not have occurred yet.
I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On November 5, 2023, at 3:31AM Central Time, Attorney General AlexanderLove sent me a Writ of Detention (Exhibit A)
2. The Writ of Detention stated that I was required to "appear in the Department of Legal Affairs discord by the expiration date / time to report for an interview or interrogation." and that I was "being lawfully detained." (Exhibit D)
3. I was already present in the Discord, as I never left after resigning as Attorney General. I cannot prove this but AlexanderLove knows this is true and if the DLA does not affirm this fact, I will call witnesses and object on perjury.
4. Because I was already present, the Attorney General added me to a ticket under the category "Interrogation Room" (Exhibit B).
5. I was told I was not being accused of a crime and that, therefore, my right against self incrimination did not apply (Exhibit C).
6. There is no evidence that they had reasonable suspicion that I committed a crime.
7. After the Attorney General warned me that non-compliance would result in an Obstruction of Justice charge, I provided the definition of that crime and stated I'd rather not answer any questions (Exhibit C).
8. I was then told I would be charged (Exhibit C).
9. The Constitution states "Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure."
10. The Attorney General informed me I am "not suspected of a crime."
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. By detaining me without reasonable suspicion (and in fact, saying I am "not suspected of a crime"), the DLA violated my right against Unreasonable Seizure (because detaining me is seizing me).
2. By forcing me to answer questions, the DLA attempted to perform an Unreasonable Search of my own thoughts and memories.
3. My actions do not match the definition of Obstruction of Justice.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. The DLA stop detaining me.
2. The DLA recognize the right against Unreasonable Search and Seizure.
3. The DLA issue a public apology that explains why their actions here were illegal.
4. The DLA commit to never detaining anyone without reasonable suspicion, and never attempt to conduct an unreasonable search again.
5. $20,000 in Punitive Damages, as the Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs are expected to uphold the law. The Constitution states that Executive Officers (including the Attorney General) are to "defend the constitution and the laws of the commonwealth."
6. If I am charged with Obstruction of Justice, it be removed from my record and any fines/jail time be compensated for.
EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D: [DLA] Writ of Detention - Dartanman
Exhibit E:
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of November 2023.
CIVIL ACTION
Dartanman
(Plaintiff)
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
(Defendant)
COMPLAINT
First of all, this is a serious issue and I'm not comfortable hiring someone else to represent me in this case. I recognize that I am a Justice, but I am only representing myself - not someone else - so this should be permissible, as long as I recuse from similar cases that occur concurrently.
As for the complaint:
The DLA and RBI have conducted an unreasonable search and seizure against me - which the Constitution protects me from.
Furthermore, when I refused to allow the unreasonable search, I was charged with Obstruction of Justice - or at least, the RBI was instructed to charge me. I have not been in-game since this happened and it may or may not have occurred yet.
I. PARTIES
1. Dartanman
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On November 5, 2023, at 3:31AM Central Time, Attorney General AlexanderLove sent me a Writ of Detention (Exhibit A)
2. The Writ of Detention stated that I was required to "appear in the Department of Legal Affairs discord by the expiration date / time to report for an interview or interrogation." and that I was "being lawfully detained." (Exhibit D)
3. I was already present in the Discord, as I never left after resigning as Attorney General. I cannot prove this but AlexanderLove knows this is true and if the DLA does not affirm this fact, I will call witnesses and object on perjury.
4. Because I was already present, the Attorney General added me to a ticket under the category "Interrogation Room" (Exhibit B).
5. I was told I was not being accused of a crime and that, therefore, my right against self incrimination did not apply (Exhibit C).
6. There is no evidence that they had reasonable suspicion that I committed a crime.
7. After the Attorney General warned me that non-compliance would result in an Obstruction of Justice charge, I provided the definition of that crime and stated I'd rather not answer any questions (Exhibit C).
8. I was then told I would be charged (Exhibit C).
9. The Constitution states "Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure."
10. The Attorney General informed me I am "not suspected of a crime."
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. By detaining me without reasonable suspicion (and in fact, saying I am "not suspected of a crime"), the DLA violated my right against Unreasonable Seizure (because detaining me is seizing me).
2. By forcing me to answer questions, the DLA attempted to perform an Unreasonable Search of my own thoughts and memories.
3. My actions do not match the definition of Obstruction of Justice.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. The DLA stop detaining me.
2. The DLA recognize the right against Unreasonable Search and Seizure.
3. The DLA issue a public apology that explains why their actions here were illegal.
4. The DLA commit to never detaining anyone without reasonable suspicion, and never attempt to conduct an unreasonable search again.
5. $20,000 in Punitive Damages, as the Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs are expected to uphold the law. The Constitution states that Executive Officers (including the Attorney General) are to "defend the constitution and the laws of the commonwealth."
6. If I am charged with Obstruction of Justice, it be removed from my record and any fines/jail time be compensated for.
EVIDENCE
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D: [DLA] Writ of Detention - Dartanman
Exhibit E:
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of November 2023.