- Username: xtub12345
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?:
Strengths: Past Judicial Experience, Legal Experience, Overall Activity, and Determination
Weaknesses: Procrastination, Not a lot of Case Work, bit of an asshole.
- What town/city do you primarily reside in?: Oakridge
- Why do you want this position?: I want this position as with the new Presidential Administration, I am out of a job, I originally left Magistrate for the aforementioned position and now that I need something to do, might as well go back to it. The Court is generally understaffed and I feel I would be able to contribute to the courts by once again joining it.
- Are you able to effectively communicate with a team? Explain: Yes, the example I will use for my explanation is my time on the courts, when I was on the courts I communicated any update on the case when needed, I wrote what I wanted to post and asked for advice, when people asked me for advice I responded to them with what I truly thought about it.
- What kind of legal experience do you have on DC outside of the court?: Outside of Being a Magistrate I have previously been a Public Defender (3-4 months I believe), a Prosecutor multiple times at the DOJ under multiple Attorney Generals, Clerk at the DOJ, and currently an Investigator at the RBI (Will leave if accepted ofc). I would also count Secretary of Commerce as there's a lot of laws I have to deal with and understand in that position.
- Links to cases you have been involved in: (These are both as Magistrate and Attorney)
www.democracycraft.net/threads/steveshat-v-lildigivert-2024-dcr-16.21652
The Motion for Nolle Prosequi is accepted this case is dismissed with prejudice.
Verdict
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT
funyolk v. gsse [2024] DCR 13
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant rented an apartment in his building. By renting said apartment, he agreed not to change it. As seen in evidence filed, the appearance at the time of filing was changed, you can see the difference based off of a model apartment.
II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Affirms apartment was rented by the Defendant, denied that renting said apartment suffices as agreement, neither affirms or disputes that changes were made.
III. THE COURT OPINION
1. First I will be...
The Motion for Summary Judgement is
denied.
1. While it is true an in-game summons was issued, the
Court Policy as written by the Supreme Court under the authorization given to the judiciary under the Save the
Public Defender Program Act states that if any of the conditions are met, then a Public Defender will be called, therefore a Public Defender has been called.
2. The Public Defender program is currently made up of
1 person, meaning it takes some time for every case to get assigned so as to not overload them. While it is true that every citizen has the right...
Verdict
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Virtus Group v. VirtuBank [2024] DCR 10
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant registered the company in an attempt to impersonate Virtus Group (A Company owned by the plaintiff)
2. An attempt to send a cease and desist letter was made by the plaintiff.
3. Defendant's company is in violation of taxation act due to failure to register as a financial institution on the forums.
II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defendant never advertised nor mentioned VirtuBank.
2. The Defendant never claimed to be a bank, nor operated in a way a...
Verdict
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
William_Normandy v. kkcrafts2020 [2024] DCR 11
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff fell into a hole on the Defendant's property and died.
2. The hole was uncovered.
II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Failed to appear.
III. THE COURT OPINION
1. The Plaintiff did not show enough evidence for the court to determine that the requested damages were needed and appropriate. Compensatory damages are warded as compensation as security or protection against a loss or financial burden, or the restoration...
Due to the plaintiff asking for the act to be struck as unconstitutional, this is a case involving a question of constitutionality, and as defined in the
Judicial Update Act questions of constitutionality, belong in the Federal Court, not the district court. This case will need to be refiled in the
Federal Court, This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
The Court thanks everyone for their time.
OPENING STATEMENT
As we have already accepted summary judgment, the defense does not have much to say in it's opening statements. All we wish is that the defenses we presented are taken into account when the verdict of this case is being written. Whilst I have not been able to get into contact with the defendant even though I have tried, I believe there was probably some personal issues that caused him to leave the server and he didn't necessarily mean any harm to the Plaintiffs.
Thank you for your time, your honor.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The defense does not wish to drag out this case considering we have already affirmed the facts of the case to be true, we wish to not waste the courts time.
DATED: This 13th day of December 2023
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
iGelic
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defense affirms that iGelic targeted the bounty set on Mr. Love
2. The Defense affirms that iGelic showed intent to kill Mr. Love
2. The Defense denies that iGelic by targeting a bounty showed intent to unlawfully kill Mr. Love
II. DEFENCES
1. Murder is defined as "The act of unlawfully killing another player. This law overrides attempted murder, assault, and trespassing." and Conspiracy is defined as "The act of intending...
Your honor, while the DLA certainly recognizes the importance of allowing extensions when IRL circumstances prevent people from being able to be active, we have noticed that The_Donuticus was on the server today more than two hours ago, suggesting that they should have been able to post a response to the motion. For this reason, we recommend you do not dismiss his Tardiness
Evidence he was online:
- Additional Information: Thank you for taking your time to review this Expression of Interest.
