lawanoesepr
Citizen
Justice Department
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
3rd Anniversary
2nd Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
lawanoesepr
donator1
- Joined
- May 8, 2021
- Messages
- 691
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
lawanoesepr
Plaintiff
v.
The Redmont Bar association
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The chairman of the RBA violated my right to recall a Councilor by saying that I did not meet criteria, In which I clearly did.
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was asking Councilor aladeen to help change the RBA by creating a more active council. I was told that the RBA had failed and that I should talk to another Councilor, I felt like the councilor was not listening to members of the board,I then motion to recall the councilor, but was told by chairman love that I needed 3 people to motion.
I. PARTIES
1. AlexanderLove(Chairman)
2. Aladeen (Councilor)
3. Lawanoesepr (Plaintiff)
II. FACTS
1. I felt that Councilor aladeen had failed to take the intrest of the board in to consideration.
2. The modern legal board act states "A councilor of the RBA may be recalled by the Board should at least ⅔ of all voting lawyers agree to this removal. A special election to fill the vacancy shall take place immediately, administered by the Department of State.". This shows that there is no criteria to motion but there is to remove.
3. The constitution states that I have
the right to vote a Government official out of his or her office. That right has not been given to me in this case.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Because I couldn't have motioned to remove a Councilor my right to remove a government official has been violated.
2. The RBA has violated the modern legal board act by not letting me motion to remove Councilor Aladeen.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A writ of mandumous ordering the RBA to put the motion to a vote as part of the verdict.
2. A permanent injunction prohibiting the RBA to not put a motion to vote.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 13th day of January 2022
CIVIL ACTION
lawanoesepr
Plaintiff
v.
The Redmont Bar association
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The chairman of the RBA violated my right to recall a Councilor by saying that I did not meet criteria, In which I clearly did.
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I was asking Councilor aladeen to help change the RBA by creating a more active council. I was told that the RBA had failed and that I should talk to another Councilor, I felt like the councilor was not listening to members of the board,I then motion to recall the councilor, but was told by chairman love that I needed 3 people to motion.
I. PARTIES
1. AlexanderLove(Chairman)
2. Aladeen (Councilor)
3. Lawanoesepr (Plaintiff)
II. FACTS
1. I felt that Councilor aladeen had failed to take the intrest of the board in to consideration.
2. The modern legal board act states "A councilor of the RBA may be recalled by the Board should at least ⅔ of all voting lawyers agree to this removal. A special election to fill the vacancy shall take place immediately, administered by the Department of State.". This shows that there is no criteria to motion but there is to remove.
3. The constitution states that I have
the right to vote a Government official out of his or her office. That right has not been given to me in this case.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Because I couldn't have motioned to remove a Councilor my right to remove a government official has been violated.
2. The RBA has violated the modern legal board act by not letting me motion to remove Councilor Aladeen.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A writ of mandumous ordering the RBA to put the motion to a vote as part of the verdict.
2. A permanent injunction prohibiting the RBA to not put a motion to vote.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 13th day of January 2022