Milkcrack
Peasent
Supporter
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Legal Eagle
Statesman
MilkCrack
Attorney
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2020
- Messages
- 393
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Milkcrack
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On the 11th of January, the president wrongfully posted a declaration for the election of the President of the Senate. This election was unwarranted and illegal. I was still dicussing the legality of this fact and had to declare in order to mitigate potential damages as required. After the senate came into a tie, the vice-president cast a tie-breaking vote in favour of UnityMaster. The VP is not the person with the authority to cast a tie breaking vote. In the case of the election of the POS it's the President's power to cast a tie-breaking vote.
I. PARTIES
1. President of the Senate Milkcrack
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On the 11th of January approximately 17:27 GMT+1 the president posted an announcement for the instigation of the election of the president of the senate. Exhibit A
2. The constitution says the following:
The Senate shall internally elect a senator to the role of "President of The Senate" whose power it shall be to preside over the Senate. In order to remove the "President of The Senate", they must resign from the position or lose to a vote of no confidence from the incumbent Senators (supermajority). Should the election for the President of the Senate result in a tie, the President shall have the power to cast a tie-breaking vote.
3. President of the Senate Milkcrack did not resign nor lose to a vote of no confidence, therefore they are not removed and continue to be the president of the senate.
4. The instigation of a new president of the senate election can only be done where there is a vacancy in the office. There was no vacancy at the time of posting the election.
5. A tie occured for the election of President of The Senate.
6. The Vice-President does not have the power to cast a tie-breaking vote in the election of the president of the senate
7. The Vice-President was added by someone to the congressional channel of the President of the senate election. The Vice-President has never been added before and this action is unprecedented.
8. The Vice-President Declared Unity had won in the senate president of the senate election channel.
9. The Vice-President abbused permisions in order to announce that UnityMaster had become President of the Senate.
10. The President is in-charge of hosting the election and announcing the winner. Therefore the announcement itself was also invalid.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Currently, our nation is being threatened by an unlawful actions which imply that seats that are currently occupied can simply be re-filled by starting an unwarranted election or nomination process. Action by the court must be taken to restore order and justice to the president of the senate and the senate chamber as a whole.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. For the falsely instigated election for the role of president of the senate to be stricken and declared null and void.
2. For me to resume my position as president of the Senate as is legally just.
3. For the DLA to investigate and sue nacho for corruption and treason.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 13th day of January 2023.
CIVIL ACTION
Milkcrack
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On the 11th of January, the president wrongfully posted a declaration for the election of the President of the Senate. This election was unwarranted and illegal. I was still dicussing the legality of this fact and had to declare in order to mitigate potential damages as required. After the senate came into a tie, the vice-president cast a tie-breaking vote in favour of UnityMaster. The VP is not the person with the authority to cast a tie breaking vote. In the case of the election of the POS it's the President's power to cast a tie-breaking vote.
I. PARTIES
1. President of the Senate Milkcrack
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On the 11th of January approximately 17:27 GMT+1 the president posted an announcement for the instigation of the election of the president of the senate. Exhibit A
2. The constitution says the following:
The Senate shall internally elect a senator to the role of "President of The Senate" whose power it shall be to preside over the Senate. In order to remove the "President of The Senate", they must resign from the position or lose to a vote of no confidence from the incumbent Senators (supermajority). Should the election for the President of the Senate result in a tie, the President shall have the power to cast a tie-breaking vote.
3. President of the Senate Milkcrack did not resign nor lose to a vote of no confidence, therefore they are not removed and continue to be the president of the senate.
4. The instigation of a new president of the senate election can only be done where there is a vacancy in the office. There was no vacancy at the time of posting the election.
5. A tie occured for the election of President of The Senate.
6. The Vice-President does not have the power to cast a tie-breaking vote in the election of the president of the senate
7. The Vice-President was added by someone to the congressional channel of the President of the senate election. The Vice-President has never been added before and this action is unprecedented.
8. The Vice-President Declared Unity had won in the senate president of the senate election channel.
9. The Vice-President abbused permisions in order to announce that UnityMaster had become President of the Senate.
10. The President is in-charge of hosting the election and announcing the winner. Therefore the announcement itself was also invalid.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Currently, our nation is being threatened by an unlawful actions which imply that seats that are currently occupied can simply be re-filled by starting an unwarranted election or nomination process. Action by the court must be taken to restore order and justice to the president of the senate and the senate chamber as a whole.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. For the falsely instigated election for the role of president of the senate to be stricken and declared null and void.
2. For me to resume my position as president of the Senate as is legally just.
3. For the DLA to investigate and sue nacho for corruption and treason.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 13th day of January 2023.
Attachments
Last edited: