Lawsuit: Dismissed Nacholebraa v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 30

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nacho

Manager
Manager
Chief Justice
Construction & Transport Department
Commerce Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
Nacholebraa
Nacholebraa
constructor
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
933
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The Senate is currently working to violate the rights of the President and Vice President to skip their impeachment trial. During that time, Senator Supersuperking proposed a motion to skip the prosecution to expedite the process. These actions are illegal per the process defined in the Peach Act—the Act of Congress defining the impeachment process that the Legislature must follow. I request that the court hereby suspend the chamber from any further action concerning the impeachment trial of the president and Vice President for the duration of this case to ensure they are awarded a fair trial for their side of the argument to be heard.
 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Nacholebraa
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
On February 27, 2024, Senator UnityMaster proposed a motion on the Senate floor to close the impeachment trial of Justice Matthew100x. This motion was immediately placed up for a vote as UnityMaster is the presiding officer. The motion passed with 3 ayes from senators Overlordofpeonys, supersuperking, and UnityMaster himself.

On March 5, 2024, Senator UnityMaster proposed a motion on the Senate floor to change the presiding officer of the Impeachment Trial of the President & Vice President. This motion further stipulates that the Senate is acting outside its constitutional powers by substituting a presiding officer when it feels there is a conflict of interest within the presiding officer. The reason provided by the Senate for the substitution was that they thought the injunction imposed by the acting chief justice was illegal. In this instance, the Senate has a clear bias in this regard as the injunction was filed by a member of a case, not by the chief justice directly.

On March 6, 2024, Senator Supersuperking proposed a motion on the Senate floor to skip President GoldBlooded's and Vice-President SomeHumanOnEarth's impeachment trial entirely. In the motion, the Senator stated that they had already made up their mind on the matter.

The Senate has the power to convict, which needs to be debated in this case. However, the ability to skip a citizen's trial is being discussed regardless of whether the motion has passed. The constitution is evident within its rights to all citizens that everyone is entitled to a fair and speedy trial presided over by an impartial Judge. The Constitution further stipulates that an impeached individual is entitled to a trial conducted by the Senate. The Senate is currently violating the Constitution by revoking this portion of the Constitution in its entirety.

I. PARTIES
1. Nacholebraa (Plaintiff)
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)
3. Supersuperking (Witness)
4. GoldBlooded (Witness)
5. SomeHumanOnEarth (Witness)
6. Matthew100x (Witness)

II. FACTS
1. On February 27, 2024, Senator UnityMaster proposed a motion on the Senate floor to close the impeachment trial of Justice Matthew100x (S.23.23)
2. On March 5, 2024, Senator UnityMaster proposed a motion on the Senate floor to change the presiding officer of the Impeachment Trial of the President & Vice President. (S.26.23)
3. On March 6, 2024, Senator Supersuperking proposed a motion on the Senate floor to skip President GoldBlooded's and Vice-President SomeHumanOnEarth's impeachment trial entirely. (S.27.23 & S.28.23)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Motion proposed by the Senate (S.26.23) outlines an apparent conflict of interest on the Senate's part by allowing them to preside over a Trial in which they have specified they have enough evidence to convict without hearing the other side's perspective on the events in which they are being tried—violation of rights and freedoms number 9.
2. The Motions proposed by the Senate (S.23.23), (S.27.23), and (S.28.23) violate the terms outlined within the Peach Act. This Act defines the procedural process for impeachment trials. They further violate section 43 of the Constitution.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Senate Motion (S.23.23) should be struck, and an impartial judge should mandated to preside over the impeachment.
2. Senate Motion S.27.23 be struck as unconstitutional
3. Senate Motion (S.28.23) be struck as unconstitutional
4. Permanent Injunction in place to prevent Congress from ever being able to skip an Impeachment Trial.

The evidence and witness list will be attached within Discovery.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 6th day of March 2024.
 
The Emergency Injunction is granted on the basis that these motions are under questions of Constitutionality and cannot be allowed to continue while under question. Any actions taken or to be taken related to motions S.23.23, S.26.23, S.27.23, and S.28.23 are now reversed for the duration of the case. This includes:
  • The changing of presiding officers of the Impeachment trials of Vice President SomeHumanOnEarth and President GoldBlooded.
  • The conclusions of the Impeachment Trials of Former Acting Chief Justice Matthew100x, Vice President SomeHumanOnEarth, and President GoldBlooded.
  • The convictions and removals of Vice President SomeHumanOnEarth and President GoldBlooded, and Bezzergeezer’s subsequent ascension to the Office of President.
  • The appointment of xLayzur to Chief Justice.
Additionally, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate may make any motions or official propositions related to impeachment while the constitutionality of the procedure is in question for the duration of the case.

Summons will be issued shortly.
 
I wish to drop this case as staff intervention has resolved the complaint.
 
Case dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top