Lawsuit: Dismissed Plura72 v. Reverse Class action Group

[Plura72]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Plura72
Plaintiff

v.

Aladeen
Matthew100x
Dr_Eksplosive
Jakovous
ColonelKai
JuniperFig
Mask3D_WOLF
Ko531
Reverse Class Action Defense Group

COMPLAINT
he plaintiff complaints against the judges for rulling unfairly against me in my cases
1. Plura72 v. Air [2025] DCR 31
2. Lawsuit: Dismissed - Plura72 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 29
3. Appeal: Denied - Plura72 v. Air - Appeal
4. Lawsuit: Dismissed - Plura72 v. Reverse class action Group
these rulings were unfair and let both the Departament of Homeland Security, Air and the reverse class action group unpunished for their horrendus actions


PARITES

Aladeen
Matthew100x
Dr_Eksplosive
Jakovous
ColonelKai
JuniperFig
Mask3D_WOLF
Ko531
Plura72

FACTS
1. The defendents ruled against the plaintiff in call cases
2. it was an unfair rulling
3. it was proposital
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. It caused me emotional damage and let dhs, air and the reverse cass action unpusnished

IV Prayer for relief

10.000 from each defendent

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 18 day of april 2025

 

[Matthew100x]

Verdict

I am moving this case to the Federal Court, since the damages requested exceeds $50,000 dollars.

I am taking this case because you have gone through and biased yourself against pretty much all of the judiciary.

As you've been told in Appeal: Denied - Plura72 v. Air - Appeal, you cannot make this case because you do not have standing because you cannot sue the air. You are being a vexatious litigator. You are making these lawsuits designed to harass and annoy the Courts. These cases have no standing. You have not articulated a reason to why we, the judiciary, are giving you unfair rulings (completely ignoring the fact that you are breaking the law). You have been filling up the judiciary with nonsense cases that cannot be resolved because you are attempting to create a conflict of interest with as many judges as possible. We have charged you with contempt of court telling you to stop doing this, and you have refused.

I will define a vexatious litigator as someone who excessively files cases that has no purpose or standing despite official warning and reprimand from the court to stop doing so. I will prevent vexatious litigators from harassing and annoying our courts.

As such, I am writing an official injunction hereby barring you from launching any cases for the next two months. You cannot pro se represent yourself for any reason. You are hereby barred from representing anyone else as a lawyer. You are not to make any posts in the Judiciary. Any and all posts are to be immediately deleted.

All posts must be made on your behalf by representation done by a lawyer. You must be represented in any situation where you are being requested in a court of law.

We're not going to be managing your bad cases. For the purposes of protecting the common law, we will be deleting any new cases that you make, regardless if you are representing someone or not. You have been proven unable to represent yourself and have given us concern that you will not be able to represent others.

Order:
The Federal Court hereby orders the following:

- Permanent Injunction lasting two months that orders you to not post any cases with the consequence being that the case will automatically be deleted.
- Permanent Injunction lasting two months requiring you to be represented by a lawyer for any time you are requested to be in a court case.

1 Contempt of Court charge for refusing to follow the directions set out in Plura72 v. Air [2025] DCR 31.