Lawsuit: Pending snow_crp v. FearlessNacktmul

[JunkCereal]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

snow_crp (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
Plaintiff

v.

FearlessNacktmul
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On the 12th of April 2025, FearlessNacktmul began to insult snow_crp. In the middle of FearlessNacktmul's barrage of insults, his outrageous behavior culminated in threatening snow_crp to "fistfight [him] irl…" During this harassment, snow_crp became distressed and could not engage with and enjoy Redmont the way he had before FearlessNacktmul's actions.

I. PARTIES
1. snow_crp
2. FearlessNacktmul

II. FACTS
1. On the 12th of April, the Defendant insulted the Plaintiff. See P-001 through P-007.
2. This behavior culminated in the Defendant threatening the Plaintiff to “fistfight [him] irl…” See P-008 and P-009.
3. Defendant was later deported through Staff action. See P-010 and P-011.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant’s actions violated the law. The Violent Offences Act § 5 (5) states:

“The act of disorderly behavior towards an individual or a group of individuals, that may be deemed to a reasonable person as causing harassment, alarm, or distress.”

Any reasonable person would deem the Defendant’s actions caused “harassment, alarm or distress.” This claim is further supported by Staff’s decision to deport the Defendant.

2. The Defendant’s actions were outrageous. See P-001. The Defendant has a history of being disruptive and is openly proud of that fact. See P-013 and P-012.

3. The Defendant’s actions resulted in Loss of Enjoyment of Redmont for the Plaintiff. The Legal Damages Act § 7 (1)(a)(III) states:

“The Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont - Situations in which an injured party loses, or has diminished, their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm. Loss of enjoyment in Redmont damages may be proven by witness testimony and reasonable person tests, or any other mechanism the presiding judicial officer considers persuasive.”

The Defendant’s outrageous behavior clearly diminished the Plaintiff’s ability to engage with Redmont. Any reasonable person would say it’s difficult to engage in a community where they’re constantly being insulted and harassed by another individual, lowering the enjoyability of the server.

IV. PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $3,750 in punitive damages due to the outrageous actions of the Defendant.
2. $4,500 in consequential damages due to a Loss of Enjoyment of Redmont.
3. $6,000 in legal fees, the minimum set by the Legal Damages Act.

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

Spoiler: P-008

Spoiler: P-009

Spoiler: P-010

Spoiler: P-011

Spoiler: P-012

Spoiler: P-013

VI. PROOF OF REPRESENTATION

Spoiler: PROOF

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of April, 2025.

 

[JunkCereal]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your honor, as mentioned in the complaint, the Defendant has been deported. It was established in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2 that deported players - even temporarily deported players - don’t have rights. In the spirit of quickly seeking justice for the very crime the Defendant was deported for, the Plaintiff respectfully moves for summary judgment.

 

[ko531]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your honor, as mentioned in the complaint, the Defendant has been deported. It was established in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2 that deported players - even temporarily deported players - don’t have rights. In the spirit of quickly seeking justice for the very crime the Defendant was deported for, the Plaintiff respectfully moves for summary judgment.

Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted

Case is in recess pending verdict.