Snowy_Heart
Citizen
Justice
Supporter
4th Anniversary
Legal Eagle
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Snowy_Heart
Justice
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2023
- Messages
- 241
- Thread Author
- #1
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
We request the courts grant a temporary freeze on the following court cases:
Lawsuit: Pending - Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5
Lawsuit: Pending - Krix v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 9
www.democracycraft.net
It has come to my attention in each of these cases that the DLA, and the attorney general have a clear conflict of interest. The DLA is tasked with defending the commonwealth however there is a clear benefit to the DLA and the executive if the commonwealth were to lose these cases.
These cases are essentially the executive vs the commonwealth in which the executive is acting as the plaintiff and acting as its defense. If the executive were to lose this case it would be in benefit of the executive and not the commonwealth whereas if the executive were to have won, this case it would be in favor of the commonwealth and not the executive. It is not beyond a shadow of a doubt that the executive would want the courts to side in favor of this case which would mean that the executive would have to lose this case and gives the executive and the DLA a conflict of interest. We would like to make an argument on why a special prosecutor should be implemented in such important and pivotal cases.
We request the courts grant a temporary freeze on the following court cases:
Lawsuit: Pending - Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5
Lawsuit: Pending - Krix v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 9
Lawsuit: Adjourned - Krix v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Krix Plaintiff V. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On December 11, 2023, the House of Representatives voted to impeach President 'xLayzur' for allegedly...

It has come to my attention in each of these cases that the DLA, and the attorney general have a clear conflict of interest. The DLA is tasked with defending the commonwealth however there is a clear benefit to the DLA and the executive if the commonwealth were to lose these cases.
These cases are essentially the executive vs the commonwealth in which the executive is acting as the plaintiff and acting as its defense. If the executive were to lose this case it would be in benefit of the executive and not the commonwealth whereas if the executive were to have won, this case it would be in favor of the commonwealth and not the executive. It is not beyond a shadow of a doubt that the executive would want the courts to side in favor of this case which would mean that the executive would have to lose this case and gives the executive and the DLA a conflict of interest. We would like to make an argument on why a special prosecutor should be implemented in such important and pivotal cases.