Lawsuit: In Session The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

[Freeze_Line]

Case Filing

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
Your Honor,

Due to the seriousness of this case, the prosecution urgently requests that the defendant be suspended from their position as a senator. This suspension is necessary to prevent any potential wrongdoing, interference with the proceedings, or harm to the integrity of the legislative process.



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Nacholebraa
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
The defendant, Nacho, has deliberately acted outside the bounds of legal authority, unlawfully representing the Commonwealth of Redmont without the required authorization from the Attorney General. A comprehensive list of cases is outlined in P-001. Nacho’s actions were not just improper, they actively destabilized the government, eroded trust in the Department of Justice, and undermined the very foundation of our legal system.

Among Nacho’s most egregious actions were attempts to remove key government officials, including the President and the Speaker of the House. These actions were carried out entirely outside the law, with no regard for proper legal protocols. Rather than pursuing a civil suit or bringing the matter before Congress, Nacho chose to exploit legal processes for personal and political interest.

The XIII right guarantees that every citizen is equal under the law, with the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. Nacho’s actions blatantly disregarded this principle, creating an unequal and unjust system where unauthorized individuals could act as if above the law.

These were not accidental missteps. Nacho acted with purpose and malice, knowing full well the consequences. The intent was clear: to destabilize the government, disrupt its leadership, and undermine the rule of law for personal interest. Such reckless and unauthorized behavior cannot be tolerated. It threatens the very stability of the Commonwealth and violates the rights of its citizens.


I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Nacholebraa

II. FACTS
1. Nacho has represented the Commonwealth of Redmont in multiple cases without the authorization of the Attorney General.

2. By acting without authorization, Nacho bypassed legal protocols and unlawfully misused prosecutorial authority, an authority that solely belongs to the Attorney General, for political interest.

3. Nacho continued the cases even after the Attorney General's disapproval.

4. Nacho acted outside the scope of the law, despite available legal pathways. He violated the Constitution, intentionally destabilized the government, undermined the legal system, eroded trust in the Department of Justice, and acted with malice.

5. Nacho's unauthorized lawsuits were targeting key government officials, such as the President and the Speaker of the House, aiming to destabilize the government and undermine its leadership.

6. Nacho's actions have compromised the integrity of the legal system by acting as an unauthorized individual on behalf of the Commonwealth.

7. As a result of Nacho's actions, public trust in the legal system, the Department of Justice, and the government has been undermined.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. Treason - The Defendant has committed treason by representing the Commonwealth without authorization, undermining our legal system's stability and damaging trust in our government.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. A fine of $25,000.
2. Removal from public office.
3. Exclusion of Nacho from public office for two months.


V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aladeen22 [2024] SCR 30
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Bezzergeezer [2024] SCR 31
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. CaseyLeFaye [2024] SCR 32
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Shadownba [2024] SCR 33
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. UnityMaster [2024] SCR 34

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 9 day of December 2024

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Writ of Summons

@Nacholebraa is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Court Order

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Upon review of the merits of the case, the Court has determined to accept a modified emergency injunction.

The Defendant is hereby suspended from partaking in any votes, or decisions that bear strict relation to this case. They are permitted to continue their legislative duties, as the court fails to find sufficient evidence of any continued misconduct.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Court Order

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Upon review of the merits of the case, the Court has determined to accept a modified emergency injunction.

The Defendant is hereby suspended from partaking in any votes, or decisions that bear strict relation to this case. They are permitted to continue their legislative duties, as the court fails to find sufficient evidence of any continued misconduct.

Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor,

The Prosecution respectfully moves for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling on the emergency injunction. Given the charge of treason, which fundamentally seeks to destabilize the government, it is imperative that the Defendant be fully suspended from all legislative activities during the trial.

Any votes or decisions, even those unrelated to this case, have the potential to indirectly affect the stability of the government and the integrity of this proceeding. Allowing the Defendant to remain active risks undermining both the government and the legislature.

We respectfully urge the Court to revise the injunction to suspend the Defendant from all legislative participation until the case concludes.

 

[Matthew100x]

Your honors,

I will be representing the defendant, Nacholebraa, in this matter. We are present in this matter.

Yours truly,
Matthew100x
Managing Partner at Prodigium | Attorneys at Law

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your Honor,

The Prosecution respectfully moves for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling on the emergency injunction. Given the charge of treason, which fundamentally seeks to destabilize the government, it is imperative that the Defendant be fully suspended from all legislative activities during the trial.

Any votes or decisions, even those unrelated to this case, have the potential to indirectly affect the stability of the government and the integrity of this proceeding. Allowing the Defendant to remain active risks undermining both the government and the legislature.

We respectfully urge the Court to revise the injunction to suspend the Defendant from all legislative participation until the case concludes.

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject this motion.

The court finds that there is not enough evidence nor structured argument to warrant a complete incapacitation of the Defendant's legislative activities. The modified injunction will remain in place.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Your honors,

I will be representing the defendant, Nacholebraa, in this matter. We are present in this matter.

Yours truly,
Matthew100x
Managing Partner at Prodigium | Attorneys at Law

Thank you.

The Defense now has 72 hours to enter a plea.

 

[Matthew100x]

Thank you.

The Defense now has 72 hours to enter a plea.

Your honor,

Discovery comes before a plea. (see Information - Court Rules and Procedures).

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Your honor,

Discovery comes before a plea. (see Information - Court Rules and Procedures).

My apologies. The previous order is null and void.

Discovery is set for a maximum of 3 days. If both parties agree, discovery may be ended prematurely.

Upon the premature end of discovery, or after 72 hours have passed from this message, whichever falls first, the Defense shall have an additional 48 hours to enter a plea to the court.

 

[Matthew100x]

Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE

The defense moves that the honorable Chief Justice Aladeen recuse himself in this case, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Under 16(4)(a) of the Judicial Standards Act (see Act of Congress - Judicial Standards Act), a justice can be recused based on bias or the appearance of bias. The Honorable Aladeen was prosecuted by the defendant while sitting as a judge. This creates a bias against my client who may not be given a fair trial. The defendant believes that this bias or apparent bias can form prejudice against him that would otherwise harm his 13th right to have equal protection and benefit of the law. For the foregoing reason, we humbly request that he recuse from this case.
2. Under 16(4)(b) of the Judicial Standards Act (see Act of Congress - Judicial Standards Act), a justice can be recused based on his Interest. The Honorable Aladeen was prosecuted by the defendant while sitting as a judge. This creates an unfair interest in the case against my client who may not be given a fair trial. The defendant believes that this interest can form prejudice against him that would otherwise harm his 13th right to have equal protection and benefit of the law. For the foregoing reason, we humbly request that he recuse from this case.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE

The defense moves that the honorable Chief Justice Aladeen recuse himself in this case, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Under 16(4)(a) of the Judicial Standards Act (see Act of Congress - Judicial Standards Act), a justice can be recused based on bias or the appearance of bias. The Honorable Aladeen was prosecuted by the defendant while sitting as a judge. This creates a bias against my client who may not be given a fair trial. The defendant believes that this bias or apparent bias can form prejudice against him that would otherwise harm his 13th right to have equal protection and benefit of the law. For the foregoing reason, we humbly request that he recuse from this case.
2. Under 16(4)(b) of the Judicial Standards Act (see Act of Congress - Judicial Standards Act), a justice can be recused based on his Interest. The Honorable Aladeen was prosecuted by the defendant while sitting as a judge. This creates an unfair interest in the case against my client who may not be given a fair trial. The defendant believes that this interest can form prejudice against him that would otherwise harm his 13th right to have equal protection and benefit of the law. For the foregoing reason, we humbly request that he recuse from this case.

The court accepts the reasoning provided by the defense, the Honorable Chief Justice Aladeen22 is hereby recused from these proceedings.

Discovery shall continue, deadlines remain in effect.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

The allotted time for discovery has now elapsed.

The Defense now has 48 hours to file a plea.

 

[Matthew100x]

Plea

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Nacholebraa
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. The defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to the charge of treason.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 15th day of December, 2024.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Thank you for the submission.

The prosecution now has 48 hours to file their opening statement. The defense will have a subsequent 48 after that.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Your Honor, I need to request a 48 hour extension. This last week before holidays is packed with school assignments and national tests, so I barely have any time to do anything other than study. I really don’t have any other options right now and respectfully ask for the extension.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Granted. You have an additional 48 hours from this message.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

The prosecution has failed to file an opening statement within the allotted time.

Consider this the first and final warning to all parties to adhere to the deadlines set by the court. Subsequent infractions will result in a contempt of court charge.

The Defense now has 48 hours to file an opening statement. Please request an extension if you require one.

 

[Freeze_Line]

The prosecution has failed to file an opening statement within the allotted time.

Consider this the first and final warning to all parties to adhere to the deadlines set by the court. Subsequent infractions will result in a contempt of court charge.

The Defense now has 48 hours to file an opening statement. Please request an extension if you require one.

Your Honor, my internet just started working again, and I was in this thread writing the opening statement moments ago. Would it still be possible to submit it?

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Your Honor, my internet just started working again, and I was in this thread writing the opening statement moments ago. Would it still be possible to submit it?

Considering the gravity of this case, I will be issuing a one-time allowance. You have 12 hours from YOUR message to post your opening statement.

Defense will then have a subsequent 48 hours.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Thank you, Your Honor.

Opening Statement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

On September 23, the defendant Nacho posted five lawsuits without the authorization of the Attorney General. Prosecutorial power is granted only by the Attorney General, and only authorized prosecutors in the DOJ are allowed to use it. By filing these lawsuits without authorization, Nacho blatantly disregarded the established procedures and aimed to destabilize the government by acting outside his authority for personal interests.

What makes this even more concerning is that Nacho specifically targeted key government figures, including the President and the Speaker of the House. Suing these officials automatically calls their status into question and weakens their authority. Now imagine if anyone could prosecute those they disagree with on behalf of the Commonwealth and get away with it.

DOJ employees can’t go rogue, no matter their justification. Allowing anyone to act independently and outside their scope of authority would ruin our legal system. Without compliance with proper authorization, the entire justice system would just stop functioning. Nacho’s actions demonstrate a clear disregard for this simple yet fundamental principle.

Furthermore, Nacho acted with full awareness of the consequences of his actions. His choices reflect an attempt to put his personal goals above the stability of our government and legal system. Your Honor, we must ensure that such actions are not tolerated, as they threaten the very foundation of justice and stability of our government.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

The Defense has 48 hours from the prosecution’s opening statement to post their own opening statement.

Prosecution, please take this time to correct your formatting.

 

[Matthew100x]

Objection

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE

Your honors,

The following sections of the prosecutions opening statement is made without any evidence backing it.

Prosecutorial power is granted only by the Attorney General, and only authorized prosecutors in the DOJ are allowed to use it

By filing these lawsuits without authorization, Nacho blatantly disregarded the established procedures

DOJ employees can’t go rogue, no matter their justification.

Nacho’s actions demonstrate a clear disregard for this simple yet fundamental principle.

No evidence has been put forward in discovery regarding the DOJ's policy that only the AG can approve cases. Under Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use) (see Information - Court Rules and Procedures), all material used for legal arguments must be included during discovery. The prosecution has failed to provide any evidence of the alleged policies that my client has broken. Therefore, the defendant requests that this line of argument be struck.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Objection

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE

Your honors,

The following sections of the prosecutions opening statement is made without any evidence backing it.






No evidence has been put forward in discovery regarding the DOJ's policy that only the AG can approve cases. Under Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use) (see Information - Court Rules and Procedures), all material used for legal arguments must be included during discovery. The prosecution has failed to provide any evidence of the alleged policies that my client has broken. Therefore, the defendant requests that this line of argument be struck.

In regards to the first statement, the objection is Overruled. The statement is an established fact within the cases the prosecution submitted as evidence.

In regards to the second statement, the objection is Sustained. The prosecution has failed to provide evidence to prove the Defendant's 'disregarded' the established procedures, and the cases provided contain statements by the Defendant in which they stated they believed they were in the right.

In regards to the third statement, Overruled. See 1st point.

In regards to the fourth statement, Sustained. See 2nd point.

With that out of the way, the aforementioned sections will be struck where appropriate. The Defense has ~20.5h remaining to post their opening statement.

 

[Matthew100x]

You'r honor,

The court's instructions allowed for 48 hours of response time. The prosecution posted their opening statement on Thursday at 10:32 PM EST (GMT-5). It is currently Saturday ar 7:18 AM EST (GMT-5). The defendant requests to have their full 48 hours and be allowed to make their submission by 10:32 PM EST tonight.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

You'r honor,

The court's instructions allowed for 48 hours of response time. The prosecution posted their opening statement on Thursday at 10:32 PM EST (GMT-5). It is currently Saturday ar 7:18 AM EST (GMT-5). The defendant requests to have their full 48 hours and be allowed to make their submission by 10:32 PM EST tonight.

Granted.

I made a miscalculation in my previous statement. Please use the correct amount of time allotted, and request an extension if necessary.