Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Youngbuck2k [2021] FCR 50

[bubbarc]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Youngbuck2k
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT
Early on the fourteenth the new CEO of DCIB (Democracy Craft Investment Bank) had made an announcement that the previous CEO (Youngbuck2k, who had resigned two days prior) had created the company as a ponzi scheme, following which the DEC launched an investigation into Youngbuck2k to figure out fully what happened, in the end all of the money was spent and unretrieveable through legal methods except 10k in their account and a commercial plot

I. PARTIES
1. Bubbarc - Prosecuting Authority
2. Spectre Industries staff team - witnesses
3. Zab - Victim (lost $19,200)
4. Supersuperking -Victim (lost $51,000)
5. Bee_101 - Victim (lost $12,500)
6. 99pizza99pizza99 - Victim (lost $5,081)
7. Maxterpiece - Victim (lost $800)
8. Youngbuck2k - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. The defendant fraudulently collected $88,041 from their victims (listed above under parties)
2. The defendant quit the server due to "personal reasons" after they had spent all of the money

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 10.1 fraud

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. $88,041 the DEC has confirmed has been involved to be charged to be redistributed to the victims

Spoiler: Evidence

DEC report

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This twenty-second day of April 2021

 

[Matt]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the State v. Youngbuck2k. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the prosecution.

AS THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, THE DEFENDANT MUST CONFIRM WHETHER THEY ARE REPRESENTING THEMSELVES OR SEEKING REPRESENTATION.


EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

The DoJ are to "freeze" (temporarily take control of), Youngbuck2k's assets of $10k and the commercial plot. Should Youngbuck2k require any of his assets to be spent/used, he is to apply to the court and state any reasons. ​

 

[bubbarc]

your honor I found that Chief Justice westray had some money in the bank, may I revise my initial filing?

 

[Matt]

your honor I found that Chief Justice westray had some money in the bank, may I revise my initial filing?

I'll be asking for a calculation of the sums later so it's okay to wait until then.

 

[bubbarc]

alright

 

[YoungBuck2k]

DC Investment Banking & Co. does not exist, which is where this alleged activity took place, as I am not related to the said entity (DC Investment Banking & Co.), I have no recollection of this claim nor any personal association to this alleged event.

 

[bubbarc]

Your honor not only should this have already defaulted in the favor of the prosecution but the defendant also perjured themself https://democracycraft.net/threads/dc-investment-banking.3025/

 

[YoungBuck2k]

Your honor not only should this have already defaulted in the favor of the prosecution but the defendant also perjured themself https://democracycraft.net/threads/dc-investment-banking.3025/

I have since disbanded the company in-game, all assets were liquidated and all entities detached. All funds/assets of YoungBuck2k and DC Investment Banking & Co. simply do not exist in the meaning that, they no longer hold value.

 

[bubbarc]

I have since disbanded the company in-game, all assets were liquidated and all entities detached. All funds/assets of YoungBuck2k and DC Investment Banking & Co. simply do not exist in the meaning that, they no longer hold value.

Irrelevant to the case and doesn't change that the case has already defaulted

 

[YoungBuck2k]

Irrelevant to the case and doesn't change that the case has already defaulted

I understand that, however, I literally have no assets. I have nothing, I have a broken elytra and some cookies, a ton of books and that's it.

 

[Matt]

Your honor not only should this have already defaulted in the favor of the prosecution but the defendant also perjured themself https://democracycraft.net/threads/dc-investment-banking.3025/

Noted that a default judgment will proceed. The defendant has provided no update or substantive defence either way. I would advise the defendant not to make such painfully obvious lies in the future, such as having no recollection of the company or this event. It seems apparent the defendant knew what he was doing.

I would ask for the prosecution to provide a calculation of monies owed at their earliest convenience.

 

[bubbarc]

Everything from staff is attached to this message, the next one will have everything from Spectre (note that this was made by shareholders, however was approved by the company's COO and sent to me after the original posting of the lawsuit and a screenshot of 99pizza99pizza99's account google document (made by him updated by DCIB)

 

[bubbarc]

Here is the rest

 

[YoungBuck2k]

What exactly are the consequences and how should I proceed to ensure a quick process?

 

[bubbarc]

What exactly are the consequences and how should I proceed to ensure a quick process?

basically the judge rules based off of the evidence already here because you didn't show up in time for the trial

 

[YoungBuck2k]

basically the judge rules based off of the evidence already here because you didn't show up in time for the trial

Understood, however, what effect will this have on me? Are there any consequences I am unaware of?

 

[Matt]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@supersuperking, @Westray, @Bee_01, @northeastprince and @_Zab_ are hereby summoned to the court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 04-2021-22-02 as witnesses. Please familiarise yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the defence.

The questions posed to you are as follows and have originated from the information presented to the court by the prosecutor.

Can each respective witness confirm the amount below that has been invested by them is correct and whether they have received any reimbursement. Should you have been reimbursed fully or partially, or the amount below is incorrect, you must let me know.

West: Invested $5000

Supersuperking: Invested $81950 - The Prosecutor must also please confirm this with the company - I can see deposits of the following: $30k on 12th March; $8142 on 29th March; $23808 on 29th March; $20000 on 30th March.

Bee_01 (HKE): Invested $12,500

Northeastprince: Invested $4000

Zab: Invested $19200. (Reinbursed $2486.25?)

IN RESPONDING, YOU CONFIRM YOU ARE AWARE OF THE PERJURY ACT - Giving knowingly incorrect testimony to the Court shall be considered Perjury. You promise to tell only the truth in any answers you provide.


Prosecutor
Please can you confirm the current status of plot r-108?​

 

[Matt]

Understood, however, what effect will this have on me? Are there any consequences I am unaware of?

The judgment will proceed without evidence being admitted in your defence. At the conclusion of the trial you may appeal however it is not guaranteed your appeal request will be successful.

 

[bubbarc]

As to the status I believe it to have been frozen by the government, I currently cannot be online to check however

 

[Matt]

As to the status I believe it to have been frozen by the government, I currently cannot be online to check however

No problem - would it be the DoJ that would manage that or the DCT?

 

[Westray]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@supersuperking, @Westray, @Bee_01, @northeastprince and @_Zab_ are hereby summoned to the court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 04-2021-22-02 as witnesses. Please familiarise yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the defence.

The questions posed to you are as follows and have originated from the information presented to the court by the prosecutor.

Can each respective witness confirm the amount below that has been invested by them is correct and whether they have received any reimbursement. Should you have been reimbursed fully or partially, or the amount below is incorrect, you must let me know.

West: Invested $5000​

In March I invested approximately $5000 into the bank. As far as I'm aware, I have not received any reimbursement since.

Additionally, after some searching, attached below is evidence of me sending such funds to the defendant at the time, should that be of help.

Please let me know of any additional questions you may have for me as a witness to this case.

 

[YoungBuck2k]

I quit the server. Also, I no longer have anything of value. I have some books, you can sell those and reimburse around $7,000 from my last evaluation. I will no longer be replying to anything related to this case.

Thanks.

 

[Matt]

Verdict

Due to no further claimants testifying as to the amount they have lost, I am unable to confirm the total taken by this malicious scheme. Westray is the only person to have confirmed his loss and therefore the only one I feel able to provide recompense to. Without further confirmation on oath by investors, I do not feel the evidence provided can be taken as sufficient proof.

As such, I order the defendant to:
- Pay Westray - $5500 (including $500 compensation).
- Pay a fine of $2000

The defendant is also sentenced to 40 minutes imprisonment.

Should any asset seizure warrant be required, I would ask the DoJ follows the normal process. Should any further victims come forward, I would ask they first contact the Attorney General, who will assist in the matter.

Thank you to the AG for their case, and the Westray to responding to my summons.