Lawsuit: Dismissed Thegoatt123 v. Crimson Dawn Construction [2024] FCR 42

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Avaneesh2008

Citizen
Commerce Department
4th Anniversary
Avaneesh2008
Avaneesh2008
Compliance Officer
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Messages
92
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Thegoatt123 (Represented by Dragon Law firm)
Plaintiff

v.

Crimson Dawn Construction
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Thegoatt123 wanted a good reconstruction of their r046 property and contracted Crimson Dawn Construction (CDC) to do it for him for $70,000. However, after 2 weeks, CDC did not do anything related to the matter or talk to him about next steps. When checking the contract again, he noticed that CDC negligently forgot to write a part of the contract. This caused the plaintiff to suffer emotional distress on his property not being reconstructed and having to deal with a broken contract.

I. PARTIES
  1. Thegoatt123
  2. Crimson Dawn Construction

II. FACTS
  1. Thegoatt123 signed a contract with CDC to reconstruct his house on March 9th, 2024
  2. The contract signed by both parties failed to include the work to be done with the contract being left at “{specify the scope of work}”
  3. Thegoatt123 paid CDC $35,000 as a upfront cost for the service
  4. Thegoatt123 tried getting CDC to work on his property for 2 weeks during which CDC had nobody even touch the property they were supposed to reconstruct.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. The contract being incomplete and failing to have the list of work to be done is a violation of the Foundation of Contract Law Act. The Foundation of Contract Law Act states in Section (6)(2) that contracts “cannot be vague or ambiguous”. The negligent failure to include the scope of the work to be done makes it ambiguous on what is to be done on the property. This makes this contract void by the law.
  2. CDC failed to do any work on Thegoatt123’s property for 2 weeks which caused lots of stress and emotional damage to him for the outrageous conduct of CDC.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
  1. Contract in question being voided
  2. $35,000 for the money paid to Crimson Dawn Construction
  3. $15,000 for outrageous conduct with lack of respect of time for the plaintiff and incomplete contract
  4. $15,000 for emotional damage suffered by the plaintiff
  5. 20% of granted relief for Legal Fees

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 21 day of March 2024
 
Last edited:
Seal_Judiciary.png



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Thegoatt123 v. Crimson Dawn Construction [2024] FCR 42. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
Your honor,

The Defendant has hired Solid Law Firm for this case. I request an extra 24 hours as today is Palm Sunday and I am celebrating it with my family.

Thank you.

Proof of Consent to Represent:
Screenshot_20240324_100554_Discord.jpg
 
Also before I get off for the rest of the day:

 OBJECTION
Breach of Procedure

My client has the right to be confronted with the evidence against them. We cannot write an answer to complaint without fully understanding the cause and nature of the accusation.

We request the Plaintiff be compelled to include all evidence they currently have before we are required to answer.
 
Dartanman said:
Your honor,

The Defendant has hired Solid Law Firm for this case. I request an extra 24 hours as today is Palm Sunday and I am celebrating it with my family.

Thank you.

Proof of Consent to Represent:
View attachment 42505
Click to expand...

The request is granted and the 24-hour extension is applied to the conclusion from the original summons. Please enjoy the day with your family and be prompt in providing the answer following the conclusion of the extension.
 
Dartanman said:
Also before I get off for the rest of the day:

 OBJECTION
Breach of Procedure

My client has the right to be confronted with the evidence against them. We cannot write an answer to complaint without fully understanding the cause and nature of the accusation.

We request the Plaintiff be compelled to include all evidence they currently have before we are required to answer.
Click to expand...

The plaintiff can provide a response to the objection within 24 hours.
 
Nacho said:
The plaintiff can provide a response to the objection within 24 hours.
Click to expand...
Your honor,

The Plaintiff did not respond in the allotted time. I request a ruling on the objection before the Answer to Complaint is posted.

Edit: "ruling" --> "ruling on the objection"
 
Your Honor,
Sorry for not posting the Response in time, I had difficulties communicating through the forums last night due to my internet and could not submit it on time. We hope you can still read our response to the objection.

Response to Objection
Your Honor,
We wish to submit our evidence and reasoning in Discovery instead of before the Defense's Answer to Complaint. The point of discovery by the court procedures "is to allow all material to enter the court prior to the beginning of arguments for the sake of fairness". The defendent argues that they wish to have access to the materials and evidences that we are using to accuse them of, however, this process is meant to be done in Discovery where they can formulate their arguments. The defense claims that they can't "write an answer to complaint without fully understanding the cause and nature of the accusation". However, we have outlined why we are accusing the plaintiff and has given enough arguments and reasoning that the defense can use. In addition, court procedures allow the defense to edit their answer to complaint during discovery if they wish to after seeing our evidence filing. We hope you will agree with us as this will establish a dangerous precedent that will require evidence for a case to be given beforehand, diminishing the point of discovery.
 
Avaneesh2008 said:
Your Honor,
Sorry for not posting the Response in time, I had difficulties communicating through the forums last night due to my internet and could not submit it on time. We hope you can still read our response to the objection.

Response to Objection
Your Honor,
We wish to submit our evidence and reasoning in Discovery instead of before the Defense's Answer to Complaint. The point of discovery by the court procedures "is to allow all material to enter the court prior to the beginning of arguments for the sake of fairness". The defendent argues that they wish to have access to the materials and evidences that we are using to accuse them of, however, this process is meant to be done in Discovery where they can formulate their arguments. The defense claims that they can't "write an answer to complaint without fully understanding the cause and nature of the accusation". However, we have outlined why we are accusing the plaintiff and has given enough arguments and reasoning that the defense can use. In addition, court procedures allow the defense to edit their answer to complaint during discovery if they wish to after seeing our evidence filing. We hope you will agree with us as this will establish a dangerous precedent that will require evidence for a case to be given beforehand, diminishing the point of discovery.
Click to expand...
OBJECTION
BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Plaintiff's time has well beyond expired and they still chose to make a response without hearing back on whether such a response would be permitted.

Regardless, I will not be asking for the response to be struck, but I do hope a ruling on the Objection can be made shortly.

I also ask the Plaintiff be reminded not to be tardy in the future, as this is violating my client's right to a fair and speedy trial.
 
Dartanman said:
Also before I get off for the rest of the day:

 OBJECTION
Breach of Procedure

My client has the right to be confronted with the evidence against them. We cannot write an answer to complaint without fully understanding the cause and nature of the accusation.

We request the Plaintiff be compelled to include all evidence they currently have before we are required to answer.
Click to expand...
The Objection is sustained.

The plaintiff should note that the time of the court is valuable for the future. You filed this case and should be well prepared to respond in a timely manner. Please ensure going forward if an extension is needed to request the court of such.

The Plaintiff is ordered to provide the evidence they currently have and submit it to the court within 24 hours.
 
Dartanman said:
OBJECTION
BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Plaintiff's time has well beyond expired and they still chose to make a response without hearing back on whether such a response would be permitted.

Regardless, I will not be asking for the response to be struck, but I do hope a ruling on the Objection can be made shortly.

I also ask the Plaintiff be reminded not to be tardy in the future, as this is violating my client's right to a fair and speedy trial.
Click to expand...

The objection is overruled.

Counsel was given the ability to respond when they missed the deadline. They did provide the court with the reason for the tardiness of response.
 
Nacho said:
The Objection is sustained.

The plaintiff should note that the time of the court is valuable for the future. You filed this case and should be well prepared to respond in a timely manner. Please ensure going forward if an extension is needed to request the court of such.

The Plaintiff is ordered to provide the evidence they currently have and submit it to the court within 24 hours.
Click to expand...
Your honor,

Does this automatically extend the Defense's deadline until 24 hours after the Plaintiff provides the evidence?
 
Motion to Reconsider

Your Honor,
The point of discovery is to allow both sides to submit evidence so the other side can review and create arguments to help prove their point. The defending counsel is requesting evidence that should not be needed to be submitted until discovery. It defeats the point of discovery as it is meant to allow for the submission of evidence.

In addition, the initial complaint is not required by court procedures to have any evidence to be filed. It does not say anywhere in rule 3.1 of court procedures that evidence is required as part of the complaint submission. Even more so that the court proceedings graphic organizer in the court procedures expects lawyers to file evidence and list witnesses in Discovery.

We again hope that you reconsider your decision as it defeats the fundamental part of discovery and goes against what court procedure is.

However, we will still attach the contract that was signed by both parties to satisfy the defendant's request.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-03-26 at 8.15.38 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-03-26 at 8.15.38 PM.png
    764.9 KB · Views: 88
Avaneesh2008 said:
Motion to Reconsider

Your Honor,
The point of discovery is to allow both sides to submit evidence so the other side can review and create arguments to help prove their point. The defending counsel is requesting evidence that should not be needed to be submitted until discovery. It defeats the point of discovery as it is meant to allow for the submission of evidence.

In addition, the initial complaint is not required by court procedures to have any evidence to be filed. It does not say anywhere in rule 3.1 of court procedures that evidence is required as part of the complaint submission. Even more so that the court proceedings graphic organizer in the court procedures expects lawyers to file evidence and list witnesses in Discovery.

We again hope that you reconsider your decision as it defeats the fundamental part of discovery and goes against what court procedure is.

However, we will still attach the contract that was signed by both parties to satisfy the defendant's request.
Click to expand...
May I respond, your honor?
 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Thegoatt123
Plaintiff

v.

Crimson Dawn Construction (Represented by Solid Law Firm)
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM Thegoatt123 signed a contract with CDC to reconstruct his house on March 9th, 2024.
2. AFFIRM The contract signed by both parties failed to include the work to be done with the contract being left at “{specify the scope of work}”
3. AFFIRM Thegoatt123 paid CDC $35,000 as a upfront cost for the service
4. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY Thegoatt123 tried getting CDC to work on his property for 2 weeks during which CDC had nobody even touch the property they were supposed to reconstruct.

II. DEFENSES
1. The contract in question should be voided and the $35,000 returned to the Plaintiff, however, this case should be ruled in favor of the Defendant, in accordance with the precedent of Lawsuit: Adjourned - Aezal v. Morgan Sheraton & Co. [2023] FCR 43.

III. COUNTER PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. $35,000 from the Defendant to the Plaintiff (nullified contract)
2. $5,000 from the Plaintiff to the Defendant (legal fees)
Total: $30,000 from the Defendant to the Plaintiff.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26th day of March 2024
 
Avaneesh2008 said:
Motion to Reconsider

Your Honor,
The point of discovery is to allow both sides to submit evidence so the other side can review and create arguments to help prove their point. The defending counsel is requesting evidence that should not be needed to be submitted until discovery. It defeats the point of discovery as it is meant to allow for the submission of evidence.

In addition, the initial complaint is not required by court procedures to have any evidence to be filed. It does not say anywhere in rule 3.1 of court procedures that evidence is required as part of the complaint submission. Even more so that the court proceedings graphic organizer in the court procedures expects lawyers to file evidence and list witnesses in Discovery.

We again hope that you reconsider your decision as it defeats the fundamental part of discovery and goes against what court procedure is.

However, we will still attach the contract that was signed by both parties to satisfy the defendant's request.
Click to expand...

The filing party of a case should already have the evidence and should be able to provide it upon request. An individual is allowed to see that evidence as if it is their right. You have outlined within the motion the following:

" It defeats the point of discovery as it is meant to allow for the submission of evidence." - The purpose of discovery is to discover new evidence, not hide your evidence from the other party you are accusing.

You further stipulate within your motion the following:

" It does not say anywhere in rule 3.1 of court procedures that evidence is required as part of the complaint submission." - It is clearly outlined within the format provided within 'Creating a lawsuit in the Federal Court'. It does stipulate at the bottom to attach evidence within your filing with the specific wording of '(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)'

I will be denying the motion to reconsider for the above-mentioned reasons.
 
The court thanks you for providing the answer to the complaint.

We will now transition into a 7-day discovery period. Please note that both parties will need to consent if either party wishes to end discovery early.
 
The Defense is fine to skip discovery.
 
Does the plaintiff wish to skip discovery?
 
The request to skip discovery is denied due to both parties not agreeing.
 
With the conclusion of discovery, the court will now transition into opening statements.

The plaintiff has 48 hours to submit their opening statements before the court.
 
Nacho said:
With the conclusion of discovery, the court will now transition into opening statements.

The plaintiff has 48 hours to submit their opening statements before the court.
Click to expand...
Your honor, we still have like 3 hours of Discovery. The plaintiff is still considering offering a witness list.
 
The plaintiff will be calling Thegoatt123 as a witness, your honor.
 
Alexander P. Love said:
Your honor, we still have like 3 hours of Discovery. The plaintiff is still considering offering a witness list.
Click to expand...
 OBJECTION
BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Court Rules and Procedures clearly state "All application of Court Rules shall be held at the decision of the presiding judge." Your honor, as the Presiding Officer you chose move on from Discovery. Counsel AlexanderLove is out of line to overrule the decision of this court and choose to submit a witness list.
 
Dartanman said:
 OBJECTION
BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Court Rules and Procedures clearly state "All application of Court Rules shall be held at the decision of the presiding judge." Your honor, as the Presiding Officer you chose move on from Discovery. Counsel AlexanderLove is out of line to overrule the decision of this court and choose to submit a witness list.
Click to expand...
Your honor, I was simply reminding the Court the plaintiff should have still had discovery time remaining. The right to a fair trial includes transparency of rules and being allowed the full window to make appropriate remarks in Court such as submitting witness lists. I ask the submitted witness list to stand to maintain the integrity of this trial. Let’s not just toss out court rules randomly.
 
Dartanman said:
 OBJECTION
BREACH OF PROCEDURE

The Court Rules and Procedures clearly state "All application of Court Rules shall be held at the decision of the presiding judge." Your honor, as the Presiding Officer you chose move on from Discovery. Counsel AlexanderLove is out of line to overrule the decision of this court and choose to submit a witness list.
Click to expand...

After reviewing the duration of discovery, the court awarded 7 days for discovery. However, I must have had my time improperly notated on my reminder. The time of discovery expiration was at 3:24 pm and not AM as I had noted to myself.

For the reason stated, I will overrule the objection and allow the witness to be submitted to the court.
 
With the conclusion of discovery, the court will now transition into opening statements.

The plaintiff has 48 hours from the original conclusion of discovery to submit their opening statements before the court.
 
Nacho said:
After reviewing the duration of discovery, the court awarded 7 days for discovery. However, I must have had my time improperly notated on my reminder. The time of discovery expiration was at 3:24 pm and not AM as I had noted to myself.

For the reason stated, I will overrule the objection and allow the witness to be submitted to the court.
Click to expand...
Your honor, I request a 48 hour extension as it is the middle of the school week.
 
Alexander P. Love said:
Your honor, I request a 48 hour extension as it is the middle of the school week.
Click to expand...

I won't be allowing the full 48 hours to be awarded for an extension. I will be granting a modified 24-hour extension as would given the original duration of 72 hours in total to prepare an opening statement and will place the deadline on Saturday morning.

Please be prompt in submitting your opening statement; a 24-hour extension is granted.
 
Your honor,

I believe the deadline passed 2 hours ago.
 
Your honor, I said I needed 48 hour extension. I was unable to post yesterday. I can either post today or you can go down as the Judge who said “f**k your real life circumstances, do your Minecraft job.” I had school and work yesterday, and the deadline was at 4AM in the morning. The Court cannot reasonably expect someone to get up at 3AM on a Saturday to write their opening statement.
 
Last edited:
Alexander P. Love said:
Your honor, I said I needed 48 hour extension. I was unable to post yesterday. I can either post today or you can go down as the Judge who said “f**k your real life circumstances, do your Minecraft job.” I had school and work yesterday, and the deadline was at 4AM in the morning. The Court cannot reasonably expect someone to get up at 3AM on a Saturday to write their opening statement.
Click to expand...
OBJECTION
Perjury

AlexanderLove posted yesterday morning.

Edit the word above you by changing one letter

Ride Side
www.democracycraft.net www.democracycraft.net
 
We will have an order in this court!

Before I discuss the arguments presented to the court, I would like to remind both parties that this platform is to clarify a disagreement. I will not entertain petty remarks or below-the-belt jabs at each other with pointless objections.
 
Alexander P. Love said:
Objection breach of procedure
Click to expand...
The objection is overruled.

Historically, the court has always permitted a single comment indicating that the time has expired.
 
Alexander P. Love said:
Your honor, I said I needed 48 hour extension. I was unable to post yesterday. I can either post today or you can go down as the Judge who said “f**k your real life circumstances, do your Minecraft job.” I had school and work yesterday, and the deadline was at 4AM in the morning. The Court cannot reasonably expect someone to get up at 3AM on a Saturday to write their opening statement.
Click to expand...

Council, I will remind you where you are. The court gave you a deadline to provide the court with an opening statement on behalf of your client.

Comments such as the one you presented to the court are unacceptable. The behavior and outburst of trying to intimidate the court will not be tolerated under any circumstance. A simple request for an additional 24 hours could have been made with a simple explanation that IRL obligations got in the way.

However, councilor, you chose to attempt to intimidate the court with a showboat comment. Since you have still failed to provide the court with an opening statement, I will be holding you in contempt.

Instead of choosing to skip your opening statement and move on(which the institution does normally), I intend to permit you the ability to provide the opening statement as I believe your client does deserve the ability to have their case presented to the court regardless of your actions presented today.

You have 12 hours to submit your opening statement to the court. If you fail to submit it, I will be forced to skip it. So I ask again to please be prompt in your delivery to the court.
 
May it please the Court,

Your honor, opposing council, this is a simple breach of contract case. The contract, if enforceable, was breached as the other party did not do any work for two weeks. They essentially held on to $35,000 for free. This is not right. The precedent the defense presented has a completely different set of facts and does not change the fact $35,000 changed hands when it should not have, and the plaintiff got nothing for this money. Essentially, a free loan was given out as a result of the contract being vague, ambiguous, and unenforceable. The $35,000 must be returned, and the Court should rule in favor of the plaintiff as the plaintiff brought forward a valid complaint. Even if other prayers cannot be granted, the plaintiff is not the party in the wrong here. The outrageous negligence of the defense to provide a valid contract or even attempt to fulfill their end of the contract (when they had believed it was a valid agreement) shows gross disregard for our client. This is an outrageous act, and thus qualifies for punitive damages. In short: an invalid contract should be reversed, and the defense should be punished for their blatant and illegal disregard toward the plaintiff. Thank you.
 
The defense may not present their opening statement within the next 48 hours.
 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your honor,

The Plaintiff boldly claims "this is a simple breach of contract case. The contract, if enforceable, was breached as the other party did not do any work for two weeks."

However, they also claim "Essentially, a free loan was given out as a result of the contract being vague, ambiguous, and unenforceable."

Yes, that's right. The Plaintiff claims this is a simple breach of contract case, as the contract - if enforceable - was breached, however they also claim the contract was unenforceable.

Your honor, the Defense asserts that this contract was unenforceable. The Plaintiff is trying to get extra damages for breach of contract when no breach occurred - in fact it couldn't have, as the contract was vague, ambiguous, and unenforceable.

The original payment should be returned to the Plaintiff, no more than that - this is the Defense's stance, and why the case should be ruled in favor of the Defense.

Then, legal fees should be awarded to the Defense as the Plaintiff has dragged this case along, used the entirety of Discovery to do almost nothing, and ultimately wasted the Defendants time and money in this case.

On the claim that cited precedent has "has a completely different set of facts"

Sure, there are differences. If they were precisely the same case, of course we would be seeking dismissal. The Verdict states "In the opinion of the Federal Court, the contract made between Aezal and Morgan Sheraton & Co. is null and void because the terms in the contract are ambiguous which violates what an offer can be in Contract Law."

Thus, the contract in this case is null and void "because the terms in the contract are ambiguous."

Thank you.
 
Both parties have presented their opening statements. We will now transition into witness testimony.

As the plaintiff has requested to testify, we will begin with the plaintiff's council questioning their witness. You have 48 hours to submit all questions before the court.

Should a question have multiple parts, please indicate it to the court, and more time will be allowed.
 
Questions for Witness

Thegoatt123:
1. Did Crimson Dawn Construction work on your property at all since the signing of the contract?
2. Did you have worries on what Crimson Dawn Construction will provide after learning part of the contract was missing?

Your honor,
We wish to ask follow up questions based on the witness response as it has multiple parts.
 
The plaintiff is instructed to provide a response within the next 24 hours, or they will be held in contempt and dismissed as a witness.
 
Avaneesh2008 said:
Questions for Witness

Thegoatt123:
1. Did Crimson Dawn Construction work on your property at all since the signing of the contract?
2. Did you have worries on what Crimson Dawn Construction will provide after learning part of the contract was missing?

Your honor,
We wish to ask follow up questions based on the witness response as it has multiple parts.
Click to expand...
1.No, they did not 2.Yes, I did not know if all the things I wanted for my house was going to be done
 
Your honor,
We have completed our questions for the witness.
 
We will now go into Cross Examinations.

The Defense has 48 hours to provide the court with questions for the witness. Please submit all your questions. If a question has multiple parts, please inform the court, and additional time will be awarded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top