Lawsuit: Adjourned theonenatr v. Richie_Z [2021] DCR 45

[Magills0819]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES
1. theonenatr (Plaintiff)
2. Richie_Z (Defendant)
3. TheRukia (Witness)
4. belrovia (Witness)
5. Magills0819 (Counsel)
6. nnmc (Co-Counsel)
7. Mask3D_WOLF (Co-Counsel)
8. AlexanderLove (Advisory Counsel)

II. FACTS
1. The Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound and went to the Hospital for medical attention.
2. He pressed the sign and called for a doctor.
3. The Defendant was online and did not respond.
4. When the Plaintiff asked the Defendant in chat to help him, the Defendant told him to ”get f**ked (asterisks added due to the forums anti-profanity filter, they were not in the original message)”.
5. The Defendant threatened to commit trespass, and discussed being shot with other players, and failed to help the Plaintiff for the next 49 minutes, until TheRukia cured the Plaintiff.
6. During this time, the injury prevented the Plaintiff for killing mobs with his friend, as part of a meat business, which would have earned him ~$200.
7. The Plaintiff, as an Armourer, was also unable to sell or craft guns during this time, which would have earned him ~$300 otherwise.
8. The Plaintiff suffered repeated damage due to this injury, and needed to consume 29 pieces of steak.
9. The Plaintiff's inability to receive treatment for his injury, resulted in unnecessary stress and frustration.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Doctors are obligated to "always prioritize treating a patient over personal needs" (Guide - Doctor Guide).
2. The information provided in Section II, and the evidence attached, clearly established the complete opposite of that happened in this case. Therefore, the damages that the Plaintiff suffered as a result of the clearly unlawful actions by Richie_Z are grounds for monetary relief.
3. Creating a negative atmosphere for another player by breaking a law has been recognised as grounds for relief, and I cite mhadser101 v withepanther773 as persuasive precedent (Lawsuit: Adjourned - Mhadsher101 v. Whitepanther773 (Case No. 05-2020-3)).
4. The Defendant did this, and caused the Plaintiff unnecessary stress, frustration, and other emotional distress, by failing to complete his duties as a Doctor.
5. The Plaintiff lost 29 pieces of steak due to the damage that was the direct result of the Defendants unlawful actions, valued at $1 each at the Apex Butchery
6. The Plaintiff was unable to craft and sell guns, which earns him ~$300 an hour, as a direct result of the Defendant’s unlawful actions.
7. The Plaintiff was unable to work for his meat company, which earns him ~$200 an hour, as a direct result of the Defendant’s unlawful actions.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $550 of opportunity costs and steak consumed
3. $2450 for emotional damages
4. $2000 in legal fees

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th of July 2021

List of Witnesses:
Doglover2342
Brenditooo
Huney69
TheRukia
Belovria
theonenatr

Evidence Attached

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Defendant,
Richie_Z, is required to appear before the court in the case of theonenatr vs Richie_Z. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures.
​

 

[Wuutie]

I also request evidence that the plaintiff wants to be represented by Magills0819.

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, speaking in my capacity as Partner at The Lovely Law Firm and co-counsel for the plaintiff, I am attaching proof of consent of representation.

 

[Antatro]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z (antatro representing)
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. The evidence cited by the plaintiff is used to argue that Richie was refusing to show up, while it is merely Relaxed talking in chat, therefore circumstantial. As it is the single piece of evidence linking Richie to the allegations, it being circumstantial warrants the dismissal of the case.
2. This lawsuit has a strong bias placed on it, as admitted, there were other doctors on at the time and they chose to call out one.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 30th of July 2021

 

[nnmc]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS

This motion to dismiss should NOT be granted. The motion alleges no correct inaccuracies nor any frivolities and should thus not be granted. I will respond to each point made in the motion.

In response to point 1, lack of evidence is not a valid reason to dismiss a case.
In response to point 2, this point is based on a false claim that other doctors were available to help. There were not other doctors on at the time. The Lovely law firm, on behalf of the plaintiff, had to open a Health Department ticket to get another doctor to come online and treat the plaintiff. Therefore there is no “strong bias” as alleged by defendant. Anyways, “strong bias” is not a reason to dismiss.

 

[Antatro]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO THE REBUTTAL

1.In response to point 1, lack of evidence is not a valid reason to dismiss a case.
- 1.The first clause is not due to lack of evidence but rather the classification of the evidence granted not meeting the requirement of the suit.
2. In response to point 2, this point is based on a false claim that other doctors were available to help. There were not other doctors on at the time.
- 2. A strong bias is in-fact eligible for a motion to dismiss due to no proof showing there is no other doctors online at the time.

 

[nnmc]

Objection!

Your Honor, the defendant is speaking out of turn. Court procedure does not allow for a response to a response to a motion to dismiss. I ask that the defendant’s “response to the rebuttal” be stricken from the record and ignored.

 

[Wuutie]

I'm overruling the objection because you answered the motion while not asked either.

 

[Wuutie]

Im going to overrule the motion to dismiss because lack of evidence is not a reason for dismissing a case. We can proceed with witnesses. Does anyone want to call somebody?

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, I believe we need to do opening statements first?

 

[Wuutie]

Oh yes sorry, the defendant may present his opening statement.

 

[Antatro]

theonenatr (The Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Richie_Z (antatro representing)
Defendant

I. SHORTHAND REBUTTAL
The plantifs proof provided showed no proof of them having an arrow wound, richie being on at the time of the doctor calling, proof of no other doctors being on at the time, and no proof of them talking to the defendant directly.
With admitting to TheRukia attending them she would have also been ignoring the call unless she got on at a different time, which there is still no proof for

II. COUNTERARGUMENT

The plantiff is suing over the defendant not attending but does not have any proper proof of the things claimed, and is asking way too much for; emotional damages, legal charges, and job "potentials". The defendant was not proven on at the time called but was shows talking in chat, there is also no proof that no other doctors were on at the time, nor is there proof of them talking directly to the defendant as claimed.

 

[Wuutie]

The Plaintiff may present his opening statement now.

 

[Magills0819]

I. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SHORTHAND REBUTTAL

• The Defendant claimed that we have not proved that the Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound, we will establish this later.
• The Defendant claimed that we have not proved that the Defendant was online at the time of the doctor calling. However, we provided this proof in the screenshot named proof of failure to respond 2.
• The Defendant claimed that we have provided no proof of no other doctors being on at the time. belrovia will be testifying that that nnmc needed to create a DoH ticket to get the Plaintiff treated, even if she did not, the doctors' guide does not have an exemption to a doctor's responsibility to act if other doctors are online.
• Finally, the Defendant claimed that we have provided no proof of the Plaintiff talking to the defendant directly. You can see this communication in Proof of Failure to Act and Proof of Failure to Act 2, in any case it is irrelevant, as our client called for the doctor.

II. OPENING STATEMENT

• Our evidence will establish that the Plaintiff suffered an arrow wound and has established that the Plaintiff went to the hospital for medical attention.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff called for a doctor, and Richie_Z failed to respond.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff asked the Defendant to fulfill his duties as a doctor, and help his arrow wound, but the Defendant tells him to “get f**ked”.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff was unable to work with his friend in his meat business to earn $200, and his work as an Armourer for $300.
• Our evidence established that the Plaintiff was extremely stressed and frustrated by his inability to get his serious injury treated.
• TheRukia will testify that she needed to get online to treat the Plaintiff.
• belrovia will testify that nnmc opened a DoH ticket with her, to get TheRukia to treat the Plaintiff.

 

[Wuutie]

The plaintiff presented a list of witnesses to testify, does the defendant want any witnesses?

 

[nnmc]

Your Honor, it has been over 48 hours since you asked for the defendant’s witnesses. There has been no response at all. I request that the court set a deadline for the defendant to request witnesses, in order to keep this case moving at an appropriate speed.

 

[Wuutie]

Noted, I give the defendant 24 hours to respond otherwise we will continue.

 

[Antatro]

I appoligize your honor,
No we would not like to call any witnesses

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@Doglover2342 , @Brenditooo , @huney69 , @TheRukia , @Belovria and @theonenatr are hereby summoned to the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-29 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the Plaintiff and may also be cross-examined.

I would ask that the Defence provides a list of all the questions they want answered by each witness in a single post. If some questions need to be withheld as they depend on answers given to earlier questions, that is also considered reasonable. When the Defence is ready, they may post questions to the witness.

I am hereby informing each witness to ensure they are aware of the provisions of the law of perjury and its severity. Giving knowingly false testimony is highly illegal. Witnesses are required to tell the truth in their testimonies, pursuant of the Perjury Act.

Once the witnesses have been questioned, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine.​

 

[huney69]

Present

 

[theonenatr]

Present.

 

[Belovria]

Present.

 

[Brenditooo]

Present.

 

[Wuutie]

Since 2 witnesses, DogLover2342 and TheRukia, failed to appear in front of court, I will order The Department of Justice to enforce the law:
Contempt in Court
This will be enforced for the coming 7 days,

The Plaintiff may start questioning the witnesses available.

 

[Magills0819]

Thank you, Your Honour.

huney69:
1. Do you agree that the screenshot Sale of Wine is an accurate description of the deal you made?

theonenatr
1. What was the impact on you emotionally of having to wait so long to be treated?

Belovria
1. Do you agree that DoH Tickets 1 - 4 (attached) are an accurate desription of your communication wih nnmc?
2. Do you agree that doctors have a responsibility to treat patients, as you implied in the ticket?

Brenditooo
1. Do you agree that Sale of Gun (attached) is an accurate description of the deal you made?

Your Honour, I have also attached Proof of Gun Sale 2, which I would have questioned DogLover2342, and would like to enter into evidence.

 

[huney69]

Yes that is an accurate description of the deal we made.

 

[theonenatr]

The impact on me was that I had a headache from having to deal with this, waiting so long to be helped that I couldn't see or move much and my friend was wanting to hunt just was frustrating.

 

[TheRukia]

I am in attendance and have familiarized myself with the case

 

[Wuutie]

The Plaintiff may now ask questions to TheRukia as well, I give the witness then 48 hours to respond. The other witness will be fined if they don’t answer within 24 hours from now.

 

[Belovria]

Apologies for the late reply, as I just returned from my break. With reference to Magills0819's questions,

1. I do agree that the screenshots provided are an accurate, and the only description of my communication with nnmc of this incident.
2. Yes, all doctors are required to attend to patients. In the beginning of a doctor's training, we stress the importance of putting a patient's health before one's very own interests. That said, failing to pursue their responsibilities is not at all tolerated.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your honor, The defendants lawyer is no longer able to take this case, therefore I will be taking it. Generic_Eagle is Richie_Z's Discord name

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, May I ask for 48 hours to familiarize myself with this case.

 

[Wuutie]

Well the Plaintiff still needs to ask his questions to one witness so don’t worry about time. But I’m going to grant it.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, May I summon 2 witnesses after the plaintiff is done asking questions?

 

[Wuutie]

Yes but wait after the plaintiffs witnesses

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Your honor, speaking in my capacity as Associate at The Lovely Law Firm and co-counsel for the plaintiff, as Magills0819 cannot get into the forums, I will be questioning TheRukia. I will keep the court updated on when Magills0819 can get back to the forums.


Question(s) for TheRukia:
1. Can you confirm that you treated our client?

 

[TheRukia]

Yes I can confirm that I attended them

 

[Wuutie]

@Brenditooo please answer in the next 24 hours or you will be fined. If he doesn't answer, then the defendant may ask questions to the witnesses. Please hold it short.

 

[Brenditooo]

yes i can confirm that you sold me a minigun with 150 5.56 NATO round bullets and a homing RPG

 

[Wuutie]

The Defendant may ask questions to witnesses now. You have 24 hours to do so.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Thank you your Honor,

theonenatr
1. How do you know you had an arrow wound and do you have any way to show to the court you did?
2. Can you show to the court how you got the amount you make on a daily basis?
3. Do you have any proof that this is what you make everyday?
4. If you were suffering an arrow wound why did you not go to a pharmacist and get the cure from them?
5. What company do you work for and do you have a contract showing that you indeed to work for that company?

belovria
1. Do you have any proof of what doctors were on at the time they asked or if the defendant had said they were busy?
2. Do you have a showing of that fact that they did indeed hit the sign and a doctor had agreed to go?

TheRukia
1. Did you get online before the defendant say were busy when the plaintiff hit the sign?
2. Did the defendant say they were busy before you cured the plaintiff?

huney69
1. Do you know if the plaintiff had an arrow wound?
2. Do you know at what time that the trade was made at?

Brenditooo
1. Do you know at what time that the trade was made at?

 

[Brenditooo]

i do not remember what time the trade was made but the date was 7/26/2021

 

[theonenatr]

1. I know I had an arrow wound since one I was hunting mobs with my friend two I can see a skeleton shooting me and /health and I have a screenshot of the arrow wound.
2. Yes I can show the court the amount I make on a daily basis Cause I make a lot each so I make at least 500 per day documented.
3. I do have some proof of some of the deals I make from selling guns and drinks But I was gone for 1 week so I got back only a few days ago and I took a mini-break so I haven't made many sales except auctions of guns and drinks
4. I'm still kinda new and I don't know that there was a pharmacist and I was blind and slow so I did not go to a pharmacist.
5. I do not work for the meat company anymore now so I can't show a contract.
This is proof of an arrow wound

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/869036079175589919/873644314687864892/2021-07-25_18.43.46.png

This is proof I hit the sign

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/869036079175589919/873644181204111390/2021-07-25_18.43.41.png

Proof of sales
Of drinks and guns that are recent

 

[huney69]

1. I do not recall ever seeing an arrow wound.
2. I believe July 25th and Im not sure about the time as there are different time zones and I dont know what time the purchase was made.

 

[TheRukia]

1. I had just got on and seen that someone needed accidence at the hospital right before I called them in doh chat t
they said that they were busy and then I called the patient.
2. yes they did.

 

[Belovria]

1. Do you have any proof of what doctors were on at the time they asked or if the defendant had said they were busy?

I would have to revisit this ticket transcript, as I believe that a Medical Specialist had said something in the transcript as well in regards to the situation. Which may or may not contribute to this matter.

2. Do you have a showing of that fact that they did indeed hit the sign and a doctor had agreed to go?

No. That notification usually shows in chat, but is not recorded for us in the DOH to look at.

I believe that that would be a staff matter, however. In addition to this, if we were to look at a date and time frame of when the patient was (eventually) attended, we can do that.

 

[Wuutie]

The defendant said he would like to summon witnesses? Please give the names now then.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honor, I would like to call Randomboi2000 and Bewoz

 

[Wuutie]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@RandomBoi2000 and @Bewoz are hereby summoned to the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-29 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the Plaintiff and may also be cross-examined.

I would ask that the Defence provides a list of all the questions they want answered by each witness in a single post. If some questions need to be withheld as they depend on answers given to earlier questions, that is also considered reasonable. When the Defence is ready, they may post questions to the witness.

I am hereby informing each witness to ensure they are aware of the provisions of the law of perjury and its severity. Giving knowingly false testimony is highly illegal. Witnesses are required to tell the truth in their testimonies, pursuant of the Perjury Act.

Once the witnesses have been questioned, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine.​