Lawsuit: Dismissed Titan Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 36

[dodrio3]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Titan Law,
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont,
Defendant

COMPLAINT​

The Plaintiff, Titan Law, files this complaint against the Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, and states the following:
On October 1, 2024, Freeze_Line was appointed to the position of Attorney General (Exhibit P-001). Because there was no Senate confirmation, this appointment was in an acting capacity, although no official announcement was made to clarify that Freeze_Line’s role was temporary. On October 12, 2024, the Senate began and completed the confirmation process for Dartanboy to become the Attorney General (Exhibit P-002). This confirmation suggests that Freeze_Line’s acting appointment ended on or around this date, even though the government did not formally announce Dartanboy’s assumption of the role.
On October 23, 2024, Freeze_Line was again appointed as Acting Attorney General (Exhibit P-003), just 11 days after the confirmation of Dartanboy. Under the Executive Standards Act, Section 5, it is clearly stated that: “After an Acting Secretary’s term is up, they may not be reappointed as Acting Secretary for 14 days.” As the gap between Freeze_Line’s terms was less than 14 days, this reappointment is in direct violation of the law, rendering it invalid. Therefore, the Plaintiff seeks to have this appointment revoked.

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF​

I. PARTIES​

1. Titan Law - Plaintiff
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont - Defendant
3. Freeze_Line - Acting Attorney General

II. FACTS​

1. On October 1, 2024, Freeze_Line was appointed as Attorney General, without Senate confirmation, in an acting capacity (Exhibit P-001).
2. On October 12, 2024, Dartanboy’s Senate confirmation process for Attorney General began and concluded, resulting in his appointment (Exhibit P-002).
3. Freeze_Line was reappointed as Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, despite the 14-day prohibition (Exhibit P-003).
4. The gap between October 12 and October 23 is less than 14 days.
5. Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act prohibits the reappointment of an Acting Secretary within 14 days of the conclusion of their previous term.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF​

1. Freeze_Line’s reappointment as Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, violates Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act, which enforces a 14-day prohibition between acting terms.
2. The Defendant's failure to comply with this statute makes Freeze_Line’s reappointment illegal.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF​

The Plaintiff seeks the following relief from the Defendant:

1. The immediate removal of Freeze_Line from the position of Acting Attorney General.
2. $50,000 in punitive damages for the Commonwealth’s failure to abide by its own laws.
3. $15,000 in legal fees, representing 30% of the total claim.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 23 day of October, 2024.

P-001

P-002

P-003

 

[dodrio3]

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION​

The Plaintiff, Titan Law, hereby requests that the Court grant an Emergency Temporary Injunction against the Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, as follows:

1. Immediate Suspension of Freeze_Line's Appointment: The Plaintiff seeks the immediate suspension of Freeze_Line's appointment as Acting Attorney General. The reappointment of Freeze_Line on October 23, 2024, violates Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act, which clearly prohibits any individual from serving consecutive terms as Acting Secretary without a 14-day gap between appointments.
2. Prevention of Irreparable Harm: The unlawful reappointment of Freeze_Line creates an ongoing violation of the laws governing the Commonwealth, undermining the integrity of the legal system and the Executive Branch’s adherence to statutory regulations. If this appointment is allowed to continue, the Defendant’s actions will cause irreparable harm to the Plaintiff and the legal order.
3. Public Interest: The immediate suspension of Freeze_Line’s role is in the public interest, as it ensures that the Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, complies with its own laws. The continued unlawful appointment of Freeze_Line jeopardizes public confidence in the Commonwealth’s ability to govern in accordance with legal standards.

For the reasons stated, the Plaintiff requests that the Court grant this Emergency Temporary Injunction to ensure that Freeze_Line is immediately removed from the position of Acting Attorney General until this case is resolved.

 

[Dusty_3]

Erm what the sigma?

 

[Aladeen]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant is required to appear before the court in Titan Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 36. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment.

I'd like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Dusty_3]

I am present your honor

 

[Dusty_3]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The Defendant, The Commonwealth of Redmont, moves that the Complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:


1. Harmless Error (Citing Rule 5.14):

The Plaintiff's claim hinges on the alleged reappointment of Freeze_Line as Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, which they argue violates Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act due to the 14-day prohibition between acting terms. However, this claim is based on a factual error. The announcement naming Freeze_Line was made in error, and Dusty_3 was, in fact, appointed as Acting Attorney General on October 23rd. Freeze_Line was never officially appointed to the position and therefore, no violation of the Executive Standards Act occurred.


2. Moot Point (Citing Rule 5.5):

As Freeze_Line was not actually appointed Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, and is currently pursuing the proper constitutional channels for confirmation, the Plaintiff's request for his removal from the position is moot. There is no active legal issue to be resolved as Freeze_Line is not currently serving in the disputed role. The Defendant respectfully requests that this Court dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 25 day of October, 2024.

 

[Aladeen]

The plaintiff has 24 hours to provide a response to the motion to dismiss.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Your Honor, the plaintiff has failed to provide a response.

 

[Aladeen]

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court grants the motion to dismiss. We find that the Plaintiff's claim lacks the required legal grounds to continue. The commonwealth's claim of a factual error under Rule 5.14 is compelling given that Freeze_Line was not appointed officially as Acting Attorney General. Furthermore, under Rule 5.5, the Plaintiff's claim is insignificant, as Freeze_Line was not at the time actively serving in the position.