Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. xEndeavour [2025] FCR 16

[Dartanboy]

Motion

MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff refusing to provide evidence to support legal argument.

Two situations are going to eventuate here your honour:

1. The plaintiff has brought a suit on frivolously because they cannot substantiate their claims, in turn supporting my motion to dismiss.

2. They are refusing to provide evidence to the defence in a case where the defence has the right to know all evidence against them

I ask that you compel the plaintiff to provide their evidence of these claims.

I see this. I need to review the case a bit more and the law. I will decide today if I'm not recused.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

The plaintiff would like to exercise its right to have another Judge review the motion.

Greetings. I will be ruling on the motion.

Motion

Motion to Recuse

The presiding judge has called my employee “ridiculous” not once but twice so far in this case. This suggests prejudice against the counsel handling this case on behalf of the plaintiff. Furthermore, the presiding judge is blatantly ignoring court procedure. He is allowing the admission of modified evidence, which could possibly harm my client in ways that can or cannot be foreseen. We therefore motion to recuse, I take it seriously when judges name call lawyers.

First, reviewing the disputed issue at hand. The argument that the evidence has been tampered with is certainly not without its merits, but considered no parts of evidence is obscured or tampered with to twist the context. Highlighting the key statements is not the same as crossing out lines within the evidence, unlike what is shown in the precedent cited by the Plaintiff. (Case), and thus the presiding judge is well within their rights to make this ruling.

Regarding the presiding judge’s somewhat colorful language, as I have seen it directed at both parties, I find no appearance of bias, and instead, a frustrated presiding officer.

As such, the motion to recuse is hereby denied.

 

[End]

Your honour, I tabled a motion to dismiss 4 days ago which I'd like to request is reviewed at the earliest opportunity.

 

[Dartanboy]

I apologize for the delay. I was (and still am) rather ill IRL.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your Honor, I'm respectfully requesting a 24 hour extension due to mental health issues. I apologize for the trouble.

You're now 71 hours late on the Response to the Motion to Dismiss and over 24 hours late on the Opening Statement.

Dragon Law Firm is hereby found in Contempt of Court for failing to provide these filings. I will be sentencing later today once I find out how many times the law firm has been been found in Contempt.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honour, I tabled a motion to dismiss 4 days ago which I'd like to request is reviewed at the earliest opportunity.

I will be reviewing it today.

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

MOTION TO DISMISS
Frivolous Claims/Lack of Claim/Res Judicata

Your honour, this case is nothing but frivolous.

The Plaintiff has claimed that:
1. I have defamed them by making malicious statements which have incurred damages which are damages unproven, unquantified, and not presented. Further, there is no clear evidence supporting any incorrect statements made.

2. I have slandered the plaintiff through public statements. There is no clear evidence supporting any incorrect statements made.

Lets talk about specific instances:



Evidence suggests that this occurred on the 29th of December and that no key stakeholders such as Department Leadership, the Public, or Congress were aware of his appointment. The Plaintiff has failed to prove otherwise, and it is improbable that this would have gone unnoticed by the nation for 72+ hours.



I have provided evidence of Superior being the Secretary on this date and making statements on the 29th of December claiming that he was still Secretary and not tracking any changes to his employment. He held roles concurrently to Secretary Superior, if his story lines up, for up to three days. The plaintiff has failed to prove otherwise.

The plaintiff has failed to show that Unity was approving projects.

The plaintiff's government was found to have wrongly taken FLyingBlock's building in a concurrent court proceeding. (Res Judicata)

The plaintiff says that the racetrack [bathurst] is moving in D-008.

The plaintiff promoted Justadumpling from Trainee Constructor to Construction Manager on or around 30 Dec (d-007). The members were removed from that role after Unity left office due to not being suitably qualified.

As you can see below, the Secretary provides that we had six deputies which were dismissed by unity, and which Unity discusses in evidence above himself.

D-017
View attachment 52030

The Dept. of Justice has not pursued a charges against me for leaking classified information. I invoked my rights as a whistleblower to release information as discussed with the Dept. of Justice.



I invite the plaintiff to read the constitution and specifically pay attention to the right to political communication. Not only is this all true, as shown above, it's protected by rights, regardless of who authoured the article.

The Plaintiff is yet to prove any of their arguments, has had almost all of their arguments disproven by defence evidence, and is asking irrelevant questions about an article I didn't author.

This case is frivolous your honour, there is no two ways about it.

The Motion to Dismiss is sustained, based on Lack of Claim. The Plaintiff provided no evidence supporting their claims that the statements made were false. Since the burden of proof falls on the Plaintiff, there is no way for the Plaintiff to prove, even in a balance of probabilities, that the Defendant's statements were false.

Although the Plaintiff has sufficiently proven that the statements were made, there is absolutely no evidence provided to even suggest that they could be false.

Given this, I am dismissing this case without prejudice, so that if new evidence is discovered which shows the statements were false, the Plaintiff will not be barred from seeking a lawsuit, however, I implore the Plaintiff not to abuse this permission. If the case is refiled and there is no new evidence, it will be considered a Frivolous Lawsuit.

The Federal Court thanks all parties for their time in this case. Case Dismissed.

(I will post the Contempt of Court sentence for Dragon Law Firm later today).