Lawsuit: Dismissed xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade v. Dwerpy [2021] DCR 26

[rilli]

[xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade] (rilli and nnmc Representing) v. [Dwerpy]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


[xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade] (rilli and nnmc Representing)]
Plaintiff

v.

[Dwerpy]
Defendant

--------------------------------------------

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs complain against the Defendant as follows: The plaintiffs were walking together when suddenly they were attacked by the defendant Dwerpy. In self-defence, the plaintiffs killed the defendant Dwerpy. The defendant Dwerpy then returned to the scene, and then killed the plaintiffs. The defendant Dwerpy then sent screenshots to Trainee Officer Alexthelillion. These screenshots were misleading in nature because they did not show that the plaintiffs were acting in self-defence. Dwerpy then used the screenshots to claim that the plaintiffs had committed the crime of murder. This convinced Alexthelillion to arrest the plaintiffs for the crime of murder. The plaintiffs were sentenced to jail for 10 minutes each, but the plaintiffs were never shown the screenshots by either a court or the Trainee Officer. Thus, the plaintiffs were not able to make an effective case that they were acting in self-defence. To summarize, Dwerpy committed an obstruction of justice by falsely stating to the officer that the plaintiffs had committed the crime of murder against Dwerpy, and by providing misleading screenshots to substantiate his false claim. Dwerpy also committed the crime of murder twice, by murdering both of the plaintiffs. Because the plaintiffs were wrongly accused due to Dwerpy's obstruction of justice, they were wrongly jailed which resulted in emotional distress and damaged reputations for the plaintiffs. This lawsuit seeks to earn redress for the plaintiffs.

-------------------------------------------

I. PARTIES
1. xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade (Plaintiffs)
2. Dwerpy (Defendant)
3. Alexthelillion (Arresting Officer)

-------------------------------------------

II. FACTS

1. Plaintiffs xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade were walking down the street when Dwerpy attacked them out of nowhere.
2. In self defense, the plaintiffs (xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade) fought back against Dwerpy and killed Dwerpy. However, Dwerpy later returns and kills both xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade for revenge.
3. Dwerpy took screenshots of when xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade acted in self defense and use it to accuse them of murder. Dwerpy presented this evidence to Trainee Officer Alexthelillion, which made Alexthelillion think that xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade wrongly attacked Dwerpy.
4. This led to Alexthelillion arresting the plaintiffs for the crime of murder. However, in reality, Dwerpy was the one who attacked the plaintiffs first, meaning that he lied to the officer about the situation at hand and gave false evidence. Thus, Dwerpy committed an obstruction of justice. In addition, Dwerpy is the one who is actually guilty of the crime of murder.
5. The Trainee Officer Alexthelillion as well as the courts failed to show the screenshot evidence that xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade murdered Dwerpy. This prevented the plaintiffs from creating an effective defense.
6. Both plaintiffs served 10 minutes of jail time based on Dwerpy’s perjurious false claims.

-------------------------------------------

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The facts show that xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade were attacked first and only killed in self-defense, and the right to self-defense is a right granted by common law. Therefore, the plaintiffs did not break the law.
2. Dwerpy is responsible for providing screenshots in a way that misleadingly depicts xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade as the attackers. Dwerpy also falsely told the Trainee Officer that the plaintiffs were guilty of murder. This is a form of false evidence as he used it out of context to convince Trainee Officer Alexthelillion to arrest the plaintiffs. This means that Dwerpy is guilty of an obstruction of justice in front of a police officer.
3. Dwerpy was the person who initially attacked the plaintiffs, and Dwerpy did eventually murder both of the plaintiffs. This means that Dwerpy committed the crime of murder twice.
4. Dwerpy murdered the plaintiffs and then committed obstruction of justice by lying to the police. This resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the plaintiffs. This caused emotional distress and damaged reputations for the plaintiffs, which is why the plaintiffs seek relief/redress.

-------------------------------------------

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiffs seek the following from the Defendant:
1. $900 for legal fees
2. $2000 as punitive damages for committing the crimes of an obstruction of justice and murder, resulting in the wrongful imprisonment and emotional distress
3. The expungement of the arrests and jail sentences of the plaintiffs

-------------------------------------------

Image 1: Shows Dwerpy shooting an arrow at Plaintiff LTSlade. The arrow can be seen in the body of LTSlade as he dies. A bow can also be seen in the hand of Dwerpy.

Image 2: At the bottom left of the screen, it is evident that Dwerpy also killed xxTigOlBittiesxx.

Image 3: Proof that the lawyers rilli and nnmc were hired by the plaintiffs

IMAGES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/186gFaB8CDoct06c_H_wyAtzm0463FkSU1di-F3OxrOs/edit?usp=sharing
-------------------------------------------

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: The 29th of June, 2021

 

[Dwerpy]

Dopper will be representing me in [xxTigOlBittiesxx and LTSlade] (rilli and nnmc Representing) v. [Dwerpy]

 

[Aezal]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL


I request that this case is dismissed on grounds of no legal basis.

Firstly, the plaintiffs prays for relief are excessive and nonsensical. The request for " The expungement of the arrests and jail sentences of the plaintiffs" has no place in this thread, and expungement should be raised elsewhere. Furthermore, the request for $900 due to legal fees is frankly outrageous. Dwerpy has no reason to pay the plaintiffs extraneous legal fees.


Also, Dwerpy has committed no form of perjury, despite what the plaintiff says. The claim that Dwerpy lied to a police officer plays no relevance to perjury. Lying to a police officer is not a crime nor is it a perjury offence. Hence, a $2000 fine for this false "perjury" offence is absolutely inappropriate.


Also, evidence images which the plantiff has raised (see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/186gFaB8CDoct06c_H_wyAtzm0463FkSU1di-F3OxrOs/edit) are absolutely not showing the whole story. Images of Dwerpy killing other players does not demonstrate who was in the wrong.

Lastly, I would like to refer to: https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/creating-a-lawsuit-in-the-district-court.6582/, as it details that this is *not* the place to raise lawsuits related to murders.

Please refer to the above post (https://www.democracycraft.net/thre...nd-nnmc-representing-v-dwerpy.7238/post-23610), I am representing Dwerpy.

 

[rilli]

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS:

To begin, we have decided to amend our original complaint. View the first post on this thread to see the amended complaint. We have replaced all mentions of “perjury” in our original complaint with “obstruction of justice”. We recognize that civil lawsuits are not meant to deal with the crime of murder. However, the plaintiffs were wrongly jailed, and the reason for that jailing is because of the previously explained story of the defendant obstructing justice and committing murder. The experience of being killed by Dwerpy and being jailed because of Dwerpy obstructing justice caused emotional distress to the plaintiffs as well as damaged the plaintiffs’ reputations. That is the real issue that this lawsuit is meant to address, and this lawsuit seeks redress for the emotional distress and damaged reputations. We have amended our original complaint to better reflect that.

In response to the first point, the argument that "‘The expungement of the arrests and jail sentences of the plaintiffs’ has no place in this thread” is not a valid reason for a motion to dismiss. Previous civil lawsuits in the District Court have requested the expungement of wrongful convictions, so clearly there is precedent to request expungement. Even if the court does not agree with our request to expunge, the appropriate response by the court would be to request that we (the plaintiffs’ lawyers) amend the complaint to remove the request to expunge, or the court could also decline to grant expungement. The fact that we asked for expungement is not a valid reason in any way to dismiss this case.

In response to the second point, the argument that “Dwerpy has no reason to pay the plaintiffs extraneous legal fees” is also not a valid reason for a motion to dismiss. Again, previous civil lawsuits in the District Court have requested that defendants pay the plaintiffs’ legal fees, so clearly there is precedent for this. Again, even if the court does not agree with our request that the defendant pays the plaintiffs’ legal fees, the court could appropriately respond by requesting that we (the plaintiffs’ lawyers) amend the complaint to remove the request for the defendant to pay the plaintiffs’ legal fees, or the court could also decline to award the $900 for legal fees. The fact that we asked for the defendant to pay plaintiffs’ legal fees is not a valid reason in any way to dismiss this case.

To address the third point, the original complaint was amended by replacing mentions of “perjury” with “obstruction of justice”. As clearly stated in Law 15.7 which was established by the Saviour Act, interfering with the process of justice through lying to a police officer is defined as the crime of obstruction of justice, which Dwerpy committed. In the motion to dismiss above, the main point was that lying to a police officer has no relevance to perjury. Although Dwerpy may not have definitely committed perjury, we are no longer making claims about perjury. The law regarding “obstruction of justice” has definite boundaries that prove that Dwerpy did commit the crime of obstruction of justice. This overrides the idea that this case should be dismissed because it is not a crime to lie to officers. Regarding the prayers for relief, as mentioned above, if the court does not agree with prayers for relief, then appropriate actions can be taken to amend the amount of money being asked. It is not a reason to dismiss this case.

Lastly, the claim that the evidence images do not show the whole story is valid. However, that is not a reason to dismiss the case. In fact, in order to show the whole story, it is necessary that this case is not dismissed, because it is necessary to have proceedings in this case. Proceedings where we can see the screenshots from both the defendant and the plaintiff would show the whole story and allow a fair and impartial justice to be served. It should also be noted that the plaintiffs were sent to jail without the government/police having the full picture. The government/police sent the plaintiffs to jail without giving them the chance to present their screenshots that would have presented a more full picture.

 

[Matthew100x]

Verdict

Hello all, sorry for the delay.

I am going to be granting the defendant's request for a motion to dismiss based on several factors.

1. The Court has not identified whether or not Dwerpy was making statements based on perjury towards Alexthelillion. What that means is that this case is not the first point of contact for resolving this issue of perjury or obstruction of justice. If the Plaintiffs truly believe that they were falsely arrested, they may submit a lawsuit against the Department of Justice for Police Misconduct and request that the DoJ hand that information over to them. Additionally, they will be able to have the murder charges that were allegedly taken off their record through a suit against the Department of Justice versus a civil case.

2. The Screenshots provided do not prove anything other than the fact that both parties were killing each other.

3. Perjury or Obstruction of Justice works in this scenario, however, this is a case of jumping the gun. You're alleging with unverified proof that Alexthelillion committed police misconduct and then placing the burden of the police misconduct on Dwerpy. As identified in point one, establish that the police did the wrong action before suing the Defendant in a Civil Court on matters regarding Criminal Proceedings.

I cannot let this case continue on because of lack of evidence/standing for the Plaintiff to sue the Defendant as is. Therefore this case is dismissed without prejudice to allow for future litigation in the event that the Plaintiff pursues the matter with the DoJ and can prove their claims.