zLost
Citizen
Public Affairs Department
Education Department
Supporter
3rd Anniversary
Grave Digger
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
zLost
Event Manager
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 651
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
zLost
Plaintiff
v.
xlayzur
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
xlayzur violated the Executive Standards Act by appointing Acting Secretaries without approval from the Senate. This is required as precedent from Dusty_3 v. The Commonwealth [2023] SCR 8 (link) states:
The RASA did amend the Executive Standards Act, an amendment to the Constitution, and therefore sought to amend the Constitution itself. By the LDV Cool Amending Constitutional Amendments Act, any act that attempts to amend the Constitution either directly or via another amendment must include the phrase “A Bill to Amend the Constitution '' in its opening. The RASA’s opening simply states that it is “A Bill to Amend the Executive Standards Act ''. There is no mention of the Constitution. Therefore, by the previous and duly passed LDV Cool Amending Constitutional Amendments Act, it is the opinion of the Court that the Reasonable Acting Secretaries Act does not meet the established standards for amending the Constitution.
So given that the RASA is null by virtue of its unconstitutionality, the Court is brought to the question of xEndeavour’s appointment. By the Executive Standards Act prior to its modification by the RASA, “Any person which holds roles functionally equivalent to a department Secretary must be approved by the Congress. This includes “Acting” Secretaries.” In this case, xEndeavour is the individual holding the acting secretary role, and the Executive Standards specifies that they must be approved by Congress. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Court that the appointment of xEndeavour to the position of Acting Secretary of the Department of Construction and Transportation without congressional approval was unconstitutional. However, regardless of the unconstitutionality of the appointment, the Court is not able to grant the first item in the Prayer for Relief, as the issue is moot.
The Plaintiff suffers harm from this as they are a department employee in the DPA, and as such affected when the Secretary is changed to a new player with almost no idea on how the department or the server works.
I. PARTIES
1. zLost
2. The Commonwealth
II. FACTS
1. xlayzur appointed Crobi268 to the position of Acting Secretary of the Department of State on 1/12/2024, yet there has been no nomination to the Senate. (Exhibit A)
2. xlayzur appointed steveshat, x_Destroier31_x, WaffleSlime4258 and xlayzur as the Acting Secretaries of the DOC, DOH, DPA and DOI respectively on 1/23/2024, and they were appointed to this role before approval from the Senate. (Exhibit B)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. SCR 8 [2023] deems the Reasonable Acting Secretaries Act (link) as unconstitutional, as it did not state it amends the constitution in its opening.
2. The Executive Standards Act, before the RASA was proposed and passed, stated:
(1) Any person which holds roles functionally equivalent to a department Secretary must be approved by the Congress. This includes “Acting” Secretaries.
3. Thus, xlayzur had to seek senate approval before appointing any Acting Secretaries.
4. This never happened, and xlayzur appointed them without senate approval.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. xlayzur is removed from the position of President.
2. All current Acting Secretaries are removed from their positions.
3. The RASA is striked.
4. $100,000 in punitive damages
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 23rd day of January 2024
CIVIL ACTION
zLost
Plaintiff
v.
xlayzur
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
xlayzur violated the Executive Standards Act by appointing Acting Secretaries without approval from the Senate. This is required as precedent from Dusty_3 v. The Commonwealth [2023] SCR 8 (link) states:
The RASA did amend the Executive Standards Act, an amendment to the Constitution, and therefore sought to amend the Constitution itself. By the LDV Cool Amending Constitutional Amendments Act, any act that attempts to amend the Constitution either directly or via another amendment must include the phrase “A Bill to Amend the Constitution '' in its opening. The RASA’s opening simply states that it is “A Bill to Amend the Executive Standards Act ''. There is no mention of the Constitution. Therefore, by the previous and duly passed LDV Cool Amending Constitutional Amendments Act, it is the opinion of the Court that the Reasonable Acting Secretaries Act does not meet the established standards for amending the Constitution.
So given that the RASA is null by virtue of its unconstitutionality, the Court is brought to the question of xEndeavour’s appointment. By the Executive Standards Act prior to its modification by the RASA, “Any person which holds roles functionally equivalent to a department Secretary must be approved by the Congress. This includes “Acting” Secretaries.” In this case, xEndeavour is the individual holding the acting secretary role, and the Executive Standards specifies that they must be approved by Congress. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Court that the appointment of xEndeavour to the position of Acting Secretary of the Department of Construction and Transportation without congressional approval was unconstitutional. However, regardless of the unconstitutionality of the appointment, the Court is not able to grant the first item in the Prayer for Relief, as the issue is moot.
The Plaintiff suffers harm from this as they are a department employee in the DPA, and as such affected when the Secretary is changed to a new player with almost no idea on how the department or the server works.
I. PARTIES
1. zLost
2. The Commonwealth
II. FACTS
1. xlayzur appointed Crobi268 to the position of Acting Secretary of the Department of State on 1/12/2024, yet there has been no nomination to the Senate. (Exhibit A)
2. xlayzur appointed steveshat, x_Destroier31_x, WaffleSlime4258 and xlayzur as the Acting Secretaries of the DOC, DOH, DPA and DOI respectively on 1/23/2024, and they were appointed to this role before approval from the Senate. (Exhibit B)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. SCR 8 [2023] deems the Reasonable Acting Secretaries Act (link) as unconstitutional, as it did not state it amends the constitution in its opening.
2. The Executive Standards Act, before the RASA was proposed and passed, stated:
(1) Any person which holds roles functionally equivalent to a department Secretary must be approved by the Congress. This includes “Acting” Secretaries.
3. Thus, xlayzur had to seek senate approval before appointing any Acting Secretaries.
4. This never happened, and xlayzur appointed them without senate approval.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. xlayzur is removed from the position of President.
2. All current Acting Secretaries are removed from their positions.
3. The RASA is striked.
4. $100,000 in punitive damages
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 23rd day of January 2024
Last edited: