Unseatedduke1
Redmont School of Law
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Popular in the Polls
Unseatedduke1
Constructor
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2024
- Messages
- 774
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Wetc
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
In the Federal court case of Steveshat v. Keystone Holdings [2024] FCR 27, the defendant, Wetc, provided their attorney with falsified evidence (Exhibit A) in an attempt to sway the case in their favor. This screenshot, supplied by the defendant's legal team, was deliberately created to obstruct justice and secure a favorable ruling for the defense. Although concerns regarding the authenticity of the screenshot were initially raised by the opposing counsel, they were unfortunately overlooked, leading to the dismissal of the case. The alleged crime came to the attention of the Commonwealth through a third party, prompting an active investigation. Evidence has come to light indicating that the defendant engaged in perjury, fraud, and obstruction of justice. The fake evidence presented by the defendant purported to be a conversation from a third-party Discord server involving a malfunctioning bot. This conversation was manipulated in an attempt to provide grounds for the defendant's legal victory. Exhibit B and B2 includes a screenshot depicting a conversation between an DLA member (we wish not to leak) and the staff member from the faked screenshot from the bot's server. Upon examination, it is evident that the staff member never made the statements attributed to them in the public channel titled "further_assistance." Exhibit C contains a screenshot from the third-party server, demonstrating a search of the channel for the alleged message from the staff member to the defendant. These exhibits collectively illustrate the defendant's flagrant disregard for the truth and their willingness to manipulate evidence to achieve a favorable outcome. Such actions constitute a breach of the principles of justice and merit appropriate legal consequences.
I. PARTIES
- The Commonwealth of Redmont
- Wetc
II. FACTS
- The defendant fabricated a conversation purportedly between themselves and a staff member of a third-party server, discussing a malfunctioning Discord bot.
- The defendant provided this falsified evidence to their legal counsel with the intention of deceiving the court, aiming to manipulate the outcome of the case through fraudulent means.
- Despite the opposing counsel raising concerns about the authenticity of the evidence, the issue was unfortunately disregarded or overlooked during the proceedings.
- The defendant's primary objective in presenting the fake evidence was to obstruct justice, seeking to evade accountability and secure a dismissal of the case. This attempt proved successful, as the case was indeed dismissed based on the presented evidence.
III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
- Perjury: The Defendant is charged with committing perjury under the Corruption and Espionage Offenses Act. This charge stems from the Defendant's deliberate act of presenting fabricated evidence to their legal counsel, with the intention of submitting it to the courts as genuine.
- Fraud: The Defendant is charged with fraud under the Commercial Standard Act. This allegation arises from the Defendant's deliberate misrepresentation of the falsified evidence to both their legal counsel and the Redmont Federal Court. By knowingly presenting false evidence, the Defendant sought to deceive the court and manipulate the outcome of the case.
- Obstruction of Justice: The Defendant is charged with obstructing justice under the Savior Act. This charge is based on the Defendant's use of the forged evidence to influence the courts into dismissing the case in their favor. By engaging in this act of obstruction, the Defendant sought to impede the administration of justice and evade accountability for their actions.
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
- Perjury: The Prosecution requests that the court impose a fine of $45,000 and a sentence of 40 minutes of jail time for the Defendant's conviction on one count of perjury. This penalty reflects the severity of the offense and serves as a deterrent against future acts of dishonesty in legal proceedings.
- Fraud: For the conviction on one count of fraud, the Prosecution recommends a fine of $10,000 and a sentence of 10 minutes of jail time. This penalty is intended to hold the Defendant accountable for their deceitful actions and to emphasize the importance of honesty and integrity in legal matters.
- Obstruction of Justice: The Prosecution suggests that the court issue a verbal warning to the Defendant for the conviction on one count of obstruction of justice.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of May 2024